Avoid Office Politics if need to ....

No matter how well your friendships with your colleagues have been, we may need put up some walls. As it may seem, if you do not establish professional boundaries, you may not have the objectivity to supervise effectively.

Many companies fall short when it comes to training new managers. Some companies do not even bother to train their managers at all and thinking that everything goes well as long no complaints from the production floor. Your bosses won’t expect you to know how to tackle every aspect of your new job from the outset, but they will assume that you will ask for the help you need. Without training, it’s easy for a new manager to overlook the implications of what one wrong thing said or done could end up. If you can’t get the level of help you need internally, sign up for one of the educational programs and improve your own skills.

If you’re new to a company, understand that no matter how similar the culture seems to others you’ve experienced, it is going to have its own unique and sometimes bizarre behaviour. Listen carefully when colleagues volunteer tips on, say, the best time of day to approach the General manager or CEO, and pay attention when they tell stories about the office.

Be careful about seemingly getting too close with any one of your seniors — even your direct boss. The best job-protection insurance, especially as a newbie, is to remain as neutral as possible on controversial issues. If your boss asks for a point of view, run through the pros and cons of a decision rather than answer directly.

Should your manager ask for your support at a meeting, offer it, but remain as neutral as possible when you’re at the meeting room table. If the boss asked you later why you didn’t speak up more, you can say something diplomatic, like “Maybe I wasn’t paying attention that point in time”. Remember that your boss could be gone anytime or tomorrow someone else got promoted and take over his place — and you could be working for the person whose point of view he totally opposed. I see this too often everywhere and my coming to 30 years of working life.

Showing your bosses that you’re ready to take on new projects isn’t just a matter of stellar performance or demonstrating initiative — though these things certainly help. You also need to prove to the top brass that they can trust you in many ways. However in big organizations, you may not be able to get close to top brass of the management and your chances of getting "up there" would be very slim. To establish more trust with your supervisor, err on the side of keeping your conversations quiet and, when in doubt, ask if the content is for general consumption.

Even with solid backing from the top, you won’t be able to get anything done if your section fellows are not behind you. This often means building support among longtime or more senior workers — including some who wanted your job and didn’t get it. You won’t win any allegiance by reminding them that you have an MBA that your last gig was at an even bigger company.  Meet with each member of your team individually to learn about his background and ask for advice on upcoming work load. Let them know you’ll be relying on their expertise. You don’t have to act on the advice they give you, but listening carefully will go a long way toward building the good relationships you will need to succeed.

From the outset, tell everyone on your team how you will evaluate performance. If anyone in the group slacks off or breaks the rules, it will be easier to raise the issue in an objective way. If it is very clear what you are measuring, you can say, ‘This job requires x, y, and z. I’m not seeing z”.

Confront poor performance head on. If someone — friend or not — is failing, act decisively. Give formal warnings, recommend how to remedy the problem, and keep a written record of your conversations. If the situation reaches a point where you have to let your poor performer go, you don’t want him or her to be surprised. Alternatively, get the HR to do the counseling.

If a manager lays out the " pros and cons of a decision rather than answer directly." they might be seen as either dodging the technical issue or maybe that you don't have the experience to give a proper answer or worst of all does not know how to manage; because  you are being evaluated through a more critical lens at that time (did the management make the right decision to promote you or was the promotion too early, etc).

The quesiton becomes, if you are really able to provide input that will be valued... and actually taken into consideration. Stating your opinion and mentioning that a) it's ultimately not your decision and b) you are seeing it through YOUR lens, and you'd like to hear also what others thoughts are, make it a better choice than walking the non-committal line. It lets everyone know that you've got an opinion and technical acumen that they will be working with and that you are interested in seeing the bigger or broader perspective, because these days, there are too many factors involving or contributing to an issue, eg. inexperience worker, many newcomers undergoing a stage of basic training,etc. It also lets them know that you are committed and interested in the well-being of the organization business, not involving or getting tangle in the office politics.

You can befriend your colleagues whoever you naturally can click with as long as you don't play favorites at work and you have an clear signal that adult-to-adult understanding of your differing roles. Work is work. Friendship is friendship. Sometimes work requires that you make difficult decisions and tackle tough issues but not necessary to offend or stab someone in the back or say bad things of others in front of bosses. This will reflect later your wellbeing when the bosses started to realise you may be "getting personal" with some of your peers or colleagues. Working life in an office environment with many different kind of human being is never simple or easy. To forgo a real friendship in this day and age when true friends are hard to come by seems more like risk avoidance. If both parties understand the roles, the friendship can work, even if it takes some hands to clap. That's been the experience, both from having been in the role of the subordinate and from having been the senior manager.

Singapore rising wage costs soon ?

Come next month, no longer wage subsidy from the Jobs Credit scheme which was mooted by our NTUC chief Mr Lim. July, higher levy for foreign workers, or pay more to hire local workers as the inflow of foreigners starts reducing. September, slightly higher contribution to the workers' Central Provident Fund (CPF) accounts.

And above all to heed national call to boost productivity and pay packages. Is this right timing to be payback time looking at the situation of European crisis sparking ?

For years, companies have creamed off a larger share of economic gains - larger than those in other developed countries or industrialising economies in Asia. As a result, workers get a slice of Singapore's gross domestic product (GDP) that is considered unusually small compared with their counterparts' share in those countries.

Workers' wages account for less than half of Singapore's GDP. In contrast, wages take up more than half of GDP in developed countries.

This means that Singapore may have achieved one of the highest per capita GDPs - at $51,656 last year. It has led some analysts to wonder if Singapore is a First World economy with what is closer to a 3rd World wage structure. Indeed our wage levels are much higher than 3rd world economies, otherwise, so many foreign workers would not be flooding into Singapore.

The issue is not our wage levels, which are reasonably high, but whether we are paid or commensurate with our per capita GDP level. So are wage levels keeping pace with economic growth? Or is Singapore's low wage share of GDP an indication that workers have been losing out? Look at our wage structure comparing to the increases in necessities, like housing or transportation cost,etc…….

THE issue of Singapore's low wage share has surfaced time and again.

In 2000, a paper by the Singapore Statistics Department highlighted this anomaly, noting that it could be due in part to conscious efforts by the Government to moderate wage increases and maintain high returns to investment largely from multinational companies. The GDP is split three ways: One share is paid out in wages, another to companies as profits, and lastly, to the Government as taxes.

In 1980, the wage share was a low 38 per cent, climbing to a peak of 48 per cent in 1985, due to high wage policies during that high-growth period. But recession hit in the mid-1980s, and the high wage policies were seen as adding to the severity of the situation as they eroded the profitability of companies.

Since then, the wage share has moderated to an average of 43 per cent to ensure a competitive wage structure. It is, however, not on a par with that in other countries with similar GDP rates.

In 2000, Singapore's wage share was 42 per cent, lower than the United States' (58 per cent), Japan's (57 per cent) and France's (52 per cent), according to the paper by the Statistics Department. In contrast, Singapore's profit share was 48 per cent, higher than these countries', which were closer to 35 per cent.

In fact, countries such as South Korea, New Zealand and Spain have a higher wage share than Singapore even though they have lower per capita GDP.

Yet, a decade later, the wage share has not risen much. At last count, it was 44.9 per cent in 2008.

In March last year, economist Linda Lim said Singapore's economic growth model has tried to 'do too much, and achieved too little' in delivering returns for Singaporeans, relative to foreign firms and foreigners. She cited the low wage share (41 per cent in 2007) and high share of profits, interest and dividends (more than 50 per cent). Foreign share of domestic production and income has also increased.

Similarly, a survey by Swiss bank UBS on prices and earnings last year showed a sobering picture for Singapore workers.

On a list of 73 cities, Singapore is the 24th most expensive city - moving up eight spots from the previous survey in 2006. It is costlier than Chicago, Hong Kong and Sydney.

But when it comes to wage levels, Singapore slipped two notches to 40th position. It is just one rung above Moscow, which is way down the 'expensive cities' list at No. 56 - or 32 places below Singapore.

With prices rising more than wages, Singapore workers cannot afford to buy as much as people in many other cities. Purchasing power in Singapore declined 10 spots to 50th place, behind cities like Bratislava in Slovakia, Johannesburg in South Africa and Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia.

While some observers question the accuracy of such comparative studies, one inescapable conclusion is that wage increases have not been on a par with economic growth.

IT GOES back to the issue of low wage share - for two main reasons.

One, the dominance of foreign multinationals, which are likely to repatriate a large proportion of their profit rather than distribute it back to workers as wages.

The success of Singapore's efforts to attract foreign investments meant that foreign investors also earned a larger proportion of the returns to capital in Singapore...Partly reflecting this, the growth in personal disposable incomes, from which households could finance their consumption, was lower than GDP growth in Singapore.

Two, an increase in the number of lower-skilled jobs created over the last decade, many of which are filled by foreign workers who depress the wages of the bottom fifth of workers here. Both trends are worrying.

‘It would be misleading to suggest that because Singapore's wage share is low, its workers' wages are stagnant despite economic growth,' says the Singapore Management University professor.

BUT whatever the difference in views, there is consensus on one issue: How the gains of growth are spread among the different groups of workers is critical. In this regard, low-skilled workers tend to get the short end of the stick compared with their higher-skilled peers, as their wages have stagnated while salaries of the rest have improved over the years.

For instance, the median monthly wage of cleaners and labourers was $1,270 in 2008, lower than the $1,389 in 1998. They were the only group of workers whose wages did not progress, according to the Manpower Ministry's report on wages last year.

The result is a widening wage gap between occupations at the top (managers) and bottom (cleaners and labourers). Those at the top earned four times more than those at the bottom in 1998; this grew to 5.12 times in 2008. This means the low-skilled workers have a less than equal share in the fruits of rapid economic growth. Income distribution is a key concern and this might be driven by economic shocks as skilled workers are better equipped to ride the business cycles as compared to the unskilled. Other developed countries have also not been spared the spectre of a growing income gap, with wages rising rapidly for the top 10 per cent - especially the top 1 per cent - at a much faster pace than for the rest.

Part of the explanation again leads back to how the profit share of GDP has risen at the expense of wages, as some top earners such as business owners also reap a bigger proportion of profits.

In the meantime, the profit share of GDP in these countries increased from around 11 per cent to more than 15 per cent in the same period. This shift is due in part to the massive surge of workers from developing countries such as China and India into the global market, which has weakened the bargaining position of workers in the advanced economies.

Does the solution for more even growth distribution lie in increasing the wage share of GDP, to tilt the balance in favour of all workers, including the low-income earners?

Great European Debt !

Web of Debt

So, is Greece, Spain, or Italy either one going to be the next Lehman Borthers ? Maybe they are not huge enough to cause global financial markets to freeze up the way US and Asian crisis did in 2008. Is it seriously that we're seeing the start of a run on all European government debt. United States borrowing costs actually plunged on Thursday to their lowest level in months. And while worriers warned that Britain could be the next Greece, British rates also fell slightly. Greece's problems are deeper than European leaders are willing to acknowledge, even now - and they're shared, to a lesser degree, by other European countries.

Many observers now expect the Greek tragedy to end in default; probably they're too optimistic, that default will be accompanied or followed by departure from the euro. The problem, as obvious in prospect as it is now, is that Europe lacks some of the key attributes of a successful currency area. Above all, it lacks a central government.

Consider the often-made comparison between Greece and the state of California. Both are in deep fiscal trouble, both have a history of fiscal irresponsibility. And the political deadlock in California is, if anything, worse - after all, despite the demonstrations, Greece's Parliament has, in fact, approved harsh austerity measures.

So is a debt restructuring - a polite term for partial default - the answer? It wouldn't help nearly as much as many people imagine, because interest payments account for only part of Greece's budget deficit. Even if it completely stopped servicing its debt, the Greek government wouldn't free up enough money to avoid savage budget cuts.

The only thing that could seriously reduce Greek pain would be an economic recovery, which would both generate higher revenues, reducing the need for spending cuts, and create jobs. If Greece had its own currency, it could try to engineer such a recovery by devaluing that currency, increasing its export competitiveness.

But Greece is on the euro and to survive the crisis, Greek workers could redeem themselves through suffering, accepting large wage cuts that make Greece competitive enough to add jobs again. European Central Bank could buy lots of government debt, and accepting - indeed welcoming - the resulting inflation; this would make adjustments in Greece and other troubled euro-zone nations much easier. Or Berlin could become to Athens what Washington DC is to Sacramento - getting enough aid to make the crisis bearable. The trouble, of course, is that none of these alternatives seems politically plausible.

What if bank runs happened, and just like the Argentine government imposed emergency restrictions on withdrawals. This left the door open for devaluation, and Argentina eventually walked through that door. If something like that happens in Greece, it will send shock waves through Europe, possibly triggering crises in other countries. But unless European leaders are able and willing to act far more boldly than anything we've seen so far, that's where this is heading.

EU leaders have insisted for days the Greek financial implosion was a unique combination of bad management, free spending and statistical cheating that doesn't apply to any other eurozone nation, such as troubled Spain or Portugal. They said the bailout should contain the problem by giving Greece three years of support and preventing a default when it has to pay 8.5 billion euros in bonds coming due on May 19.

Again yesterday, European leaders were almost desperately trying to talk away the problems. Agreement on rescue for Greece will be a demonstration of Europe's force, of solidarity. The markets have taken little heed. Stocks, Greek bonds and the euro plunged even yesterday. Along with the eurozone meeting, the G-7 finance ministers will hold a teleconference yesterday on the crisis, according to Japan's finance minister.

And on top of the eurozone summit, key leaders like France's Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet will huddle ahead of time seeking a common strategy to soothe the markets. Well these new leaders have to work harder before they can enjoy their lead in either running the government office or at home relaxing with their spouse and children....


16 May 2010 Sunday report on paper,
Yet financial experts say the Greek crisis is unlikely to spark another global meltdown.

The European Union (EU) rescue package (worth $1.4 trillion) is sufficiently large and wide-ranging as to put an end to concerns over a liquidity crisis that could have threatened contagion in global markets but many EU countries will likely see very slow growth for a number of years because the package requires nations with unsustainably large budget deficits to implement strict spending cuts and tax rises.

Greek crisis
Greece is at the centre of the storm. Credit agencies like Moody's questioned the state's ability to meet its debt obligations and downgraded its credit rating with an accompanying negative outlook.
There were already concerns over the high level of deficit-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio for Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain - known collectively by the acronym Piigs, noted First State Investments. The European Commission set a rule that this ratio should be kept at 3 per cent or lower but it turned out that the ratio for the Piigs exceeded a great deal. For instance, Greece, Portugal and Spain have a deficit-to-GDP ratio of 13.6 per cent, 9.4 per cent and 11.2 per cent respectively.

Contagion effect
Contagion risk is the fear that financial problems in one nation will spread to others which are linked to one another in some way. This happened during the Asian financial crisis when the currency turmoil in Thailand brought volatility in Indonesia and other neighbouring nations.
The contagion effect from the debt issues in Greece has hit other European countries, including the other Piigs. The potential contagion effect of any of these countries defaulting on their debts becomes clearer when we take a look at their loans to one another.

For example, Greece and Spain borrowed externally from many other European countries, in particular France and Germany. Germany and France are Spain's largest creditors with more than US$500 billion (S$694 billion) of exposure between them.
So the contagion risk is very real given that if any of the Piigs were to default, it would adversely impact the balance sheets of other EU countries.

Impact on stock markets
Stock markets have headed south in recent weeks and are experiencing significant volatility.
But experts are confident that this is a short-term reaction. 'Our 12-month fair value for the STI is 3,200. In the short term, we think the market will be range bound from 2,750 to 2,930,' she said. 'We will be buyers if the index falls back to 2,750 as further downside risk from there should be limited.'
While the weakened euro and current economic conditions in Europe may spell weaker demand for Asian exports, exports could still be supported by US demand and intra-regional trade. 'We do not believe that recent sell-off is a renewed bear market.'
While the short- to medium-term outlook is expected to remain cautious, the selldown has brought valuations to more attractive levels. Calling the selling a 'knee-jerk' reaction, smart money to gradually return to the market once the initial selling is over, as liquidity in the market remains strong.
In addition, equities continue to be good, long-term investments especially since current corporate results have generally been in line with or above expectations.

Impact on Asia
Though Asian investors may not be directly affected by the crisis, there are several indirect implications, such as declining demand for Asian exports.
The weakening of the euro means that European consumers have lower purchasing power, and with the EU being a key export market for Asian (economies) like China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore and Malaysia, exports for these Asian economies could see a negative impact.
Financial experts pointed out that as an export market, Europe is as important as the US is, to Asia.

Asia's export exposure to Europe constitutes about 12 per cent of its total exports on average, with India and China having the largest export exposure of close to 20 per cent. Singapore has a 9.4 per cent export exposure to Europe.
The implementation of austerity measures in Greece is likely to be followed in weaker European economies like Portugal while larger economies like Britain are looking to rein in spending to avoid similar debt problems. This could signal a longer-term shift to weaker consumer consumption, and that is a negative for export-oriented Asian economies.

Other factors
Besides the Greek debt crisis, other possible headwinds for investors include the ongoing Goldman Sachs case where the US investment bank is facing a number of related lawsuits and investigations over the sale of mortgage-related investments. Another concern is the move by the Chinese government to curb rising property prices through tightening credit.

Well, what do we do with our cash, not worth to deposit in the bank and we need to make it growth with annual rate of few percentage point in order to benefit on it's cash value? Think twice to buy stocks at this moment, I suppose.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

The real reasons for the euro-led collapse are: an over-reliance on debt to grease the wheels of growth; countries and people living beyond their means, largely through borrowing and poor regulation by governments and central bankers; and excessive risk-taking - or greed, if you prefer - by inadequately capitalised investment banks which, it has to be said, ran many a hugely profitable scam in the past decade selling junk to a hapless public, often with the blessing of complacent regulators.

Perhaps just as relevant has been the inability of various government-led support measures to have an impact - from the US$1 trillion safety net announced by euro zone finance ministers a fortnight ago to German bans on naked short-selling.

Will Euro survive ?
The euro, the common currency of 16 European Union nations, is undergoing its severest test since its inception in 1999. Now at a four-year low against the dollar, the euro's credibility has been hammered by the slow and confused European response to the debt crisis in Greece, which has now spread to Spain and Portugal.

European stock markets have retreated and a massive US$1 trillion rescue programme announced on May 9 has thus far failed to calm investors nerves. Suddenly people are asking what was unthinkable - will the euro survive, might the currency union fall apart? Since January, Europe has dawdled while Greece - one of the eurozone's weakest members - had to pay progressively higher interest rates on a debt that was growing faster than bond holders had been led to believe.
While Greece pleaded for help, Germany, the eurozone's biggest economy, resisted, saying the profligate Greeks had to clean up their own mess and cut government spending.

By April, Greece sought emergency help not only from its European Union partners but also from the International Monetary Fund. At the centre of the storm is 'Mr Euro', Jean-Claude Trichet, the astute 67-year-old Frenchman who has headed the ECB since 2003. By holding too long to the view that there was no possibility that Greece could default, Mr Trichet like others underestimated the magnitude of the Greek problem.

As the euro tumbled on exchange markets, government leaders finally realised that not just Greece but the entire euro currency project was at risk. At an emergency meeting in Brussels on May 7th eurozone leaders outlined the massive rescue package that emerged two days later from an 11-hour long meeting of finance ministers.

President Obama is not a passive bystander to the euro crisis. Alarmed that a double-dip recession and credit squeeze in Europe would derail the US recovery, Mr Obama telephoned the French, German and Spanish leaders urging prompt, decisive action. Mr Trichet, sobered by the crisis, is calling for 'a quantum leap in the governance of the euro area', meaning enforceable rules to assure fiscal discipline.


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Change of Fortunes :
HOW times change. It was fashionable even as recently as January this year, to proclaim that the euro would emerge as the world's key reserve currency because the United States was weighted down by its huge trade and fiscal deficits.

It was held as an article of economic faith that saver nations will, at some point, become unwilling to subsidise the penchant of Americans to consume far more than they produce. A disastrous fall in the value of the US dollar would end the unique advantage the US has enjoyed in possessing the global reserve currency since World War II.


Many lent their names to this theory. Even the former Federal Reserve Board chairman, Alan Greenspan, had an inkling of the US dollar's doom. It is 'absolutely conceivable that the euro will replace the (US) dollar as the reserve currency, or will be traded as an equally important reserve currency', he told the weekly, Stern, in 2007.
For now at least, all these views seem misplaced. The euro is gasping for air. In a dramatic reversal, the euro has fallen nearly 22 per cent from its peak reached in July in 2008.

When it was launched in January 1999, the euro was placed at a slightly stronger level against the dollar. Then, it fell through parity and languished for three years. It went down as low as US$0.82 in October 2000, before soaring to a high of US$1.60 in July, 2008. This remarkable surge helped to spread the optimism about the euro's dominant future. Conspiracy theories began to take shape. Wasn't the euro a factor behind the invasion of Iraq?
As the US dollar began to crumble, talk was rife that Opec would finish the job, delivering a deadly blow to American prestige and economy.


There were reports of a secret understanding among the big oil producers to dump the US dollar.
Indeed, across the world, central banks stepped up their holdings of euros in their reserves. According to the International Monetary Fund, euro-denominated reserves with central banks, excluding China, rose to 672 billion at the end of last year, from 97 billion in the first quarter of 2002. While China intends keep to diversifying its holdings, Russia has trimmed its euro reserves and Iran is having a rethink of its reserves.
For years, the euro seemed to defy the question of how a common currency could run without a common government. Many economists indeed thought that, after the initial years, a recession would wreck eurozone cohesion.
The scenario put out was that when a recession affects weak areas of Europe, it would lead to a conflict of interest vis-a-vis countries committed to disciplined economic policy.

Weak economies with populist governments, wanting low interest rates, would be willing to put up with some inflation. But strong economies like Germany, serious about maintaining price stability at all costs, would not oblige. And Europe would struggle to handle 'the asymmetric shocks' that would follow. Language barriers and a general reluctance of European labour to move within the eurozone would further handicap the governments.

The result would be a vicious political row and a potential financial crisis, as market players start to discount the bonds of weaker governments.
That script is now being played out. Germany's unilateral ban on naked short-selling - which was immediately opposed by France - has exposed a lack of cohesion in the EU nations. Worries are growing about the contagion spreading. The prospect of widespread government spending cuts is raising the spectre of social unrest and political turmoil in Europe. Analysts and chartists are predicting further falls in the value of the euro, which is trading at about US$1.23 now, or close to a four-year low.
So for now, and what for it is worth, the American dollar is back again as the top reserve currency and a safe haven.
However, while Europe is indeed in the midst of a major crisis, the economic shockwaves can travel beyond European shores. Moreover, the US has enormous budget deficits and debts as well. And many US companies have major exposures to the European continent - all of which makes the US economy also vulnerable.

"Green" youngsters arrogant with dis-respect nowadays in your workplace?

Arrogance in many ways exhibit unacceptable behaviour like offensive display of superiority, self-importance, overbearing pride, haughtiness, behaving in a superior manner as if he is the BOSS.

We all in life probably have encounter or experienced arrogance by others at some time in our working life. An arrogant person may affect you in many ways, and depending on your position you may or may not be able to control or educate such people. For example, an arrogant supervisor, engineer, shopfloor worker, boss or reputed personality can make life hell for his subordinates or those indirectly reporting to him in project execution or at the site where you need to follow his instruction and he or she continues to behave with brazen superiority with everyone.

If you are not able to do anything because such people has been assigned to lead your core necessities like making upto exams, promotions, performance appraisal, direct report to the senior management, etc.

But in some cases you can hit back with all your power at arrogant people. Nevertheless arrogant people in all walks of life will be shortlived as they either cannot last or burn themselves out with their own setback. Behind the back gossip like, "He or she has become arrogant now, but wasn’t like that before" is quite common in most workplaces, amongst friends, colleagues, etc. However it does not mean arrogant people will be boorish with everyone, but they will definitely not miss an opportunity to demonstrate it on someone they can afford to be rude with.

Often the person being branded arrogant may not truly realize they have indeed become arrogant. For example, we rarely think of ourselves as being arrogant as we usually believe it is always someone else who can be arrogant, but not us. But arrogance does exist in various degrees in everyone, including you and me. Now suppose you discover that people who matter to you are calling you arrogant behind your back? Or worse, someone tells you flat on your face that you are indeed arrogant. What will be your reaction? It can rudely jolt you from the grand benevolent image you hold of yourself.

Nobody would like to be branded as arrogant. You could get furious, outraged and vehemently disagree with their opinion. Or, if you can control your senses, you can stop and think of it as a wake up call to mend your ways. Arrogance is like a special body odour that you can’t detect it yourself because you have already feel the "highs" in yourself and everyone else cannot hold up to you.

So what are those likely indicators that can make some youngsters arrogant and feel high and mighty?

It could be his experience and knowledge have built up day by day. He may have gotten all the answers for everything through his subordinates or peers and gaining all the credit, or you believe it so ( see my other blog about gaining credit, it is Ok let others take your credit, do not feel bad !! ). Soon he begin to think and feel he is the so-call “expert” in everything and all others are dependant on him. And these young horns gradually become dismissive of suggestions and recommendations by the older colleagues, except his own, of course. Let’s face it, in big organization, you depend a lot from those seniors and more experience workers to lead the success story of the organization and green horns still have a lot to pick and learn.

Next indicator is probably he has now a new job title that can create an aura of awe. Titles having groovy words like deputy manager, consultant, advisor, deputy project manager, etc., can corrupt the green horn’s ego faster than a person who has gone through years of hardship but with a mediocre title like departmental manager, though both could be doing identical job description.

He also may develop connections with reputed people, top brass, senior management level, etc., and hover around important staff like the director or general manager of the department. He probably has got the blessings of a “godfather” who is quite senior in the office and has laid the ground for the young punk to step on. So the punky now feels like a VIP with the power to crush ordinary mortals or his juniors reporting under or indirectly to him.

Frequent completion of achievements can be a powerful arrogance booster. For example, he or she had a series of tasks completed and the boss has promised of future quick advancement or promotion in the coming annual appraisal review. Everything turns out in his favour and probably he has been very smart and quick in burying his/her failures before anyone notices them. Or somebody is doing the work and producing the results, while he/she are getting the rewards and credits in front of the bosses. During temporary lucky periods in life a feeling of Midas touch can get into people’s head. This is often the reason why many well known film personalities, business owners, etc., become haughty and pushy.

The arrogants now don't provide solutions to questions anymore. Instead they now answer every question with another question. They develop the skill to invent tough and tricky questions on the fly ( because probably they do not have answers at all ) that can make others squirm, chew their head off or make them flee from the scene.

In addition to the above factors, an individual’s personal qualities, or Mother Nature’s temporary gifts to humans like young age, physical strength, beauty, good health, IQ, etc., can also make one arrogant.

Finally the challenge for each one of us is to frequently pause and observe ourselves to see if any of the above factors are making us with high self esteem.

Failures are meant to destroy arrogance and induce humility in a person. One's overbearing pride in himself is manifested in his manners especially towards his inferiors. It is said that if you want to judge a person see how he behaves towards his inferiors. In my 30 years of service, I have seen arrogants but by the time they progress with more pressure the failures subdue them. If you come across any arrogant young punk, then take it that he has not learnt from his failures yet.

Arrogance is a like a deadly disease , Pride is it's ally. Power, wealth, fame brings arrogance into the human being, but final destiny is a great leveller, no one can fight the destiny , The destiny shows one to become humble to correct his ways to reform by various incidences to check his selfness and arrogance,it provides him a chance to reflect but most remain arrogant and return to normal ways once everything is normal , only a transient phase they eat a “humble pie” and when back to normal then it is again power arrogance.

Because humble pies were primarily served to the most humble of servants, a connection developed between the consumption of a dubious but filling dish and a true sense of humility. The word "humble" in the metaphorical "humble pie" comes from the Latin humilis, meaning "from the earth,"

Eating humble pie is meant to be a metaphorical punishment for excessive arrogance or boasting. Few people would ever eat such a dish voluntarily, but others may wish that particularly self-important public figures or abusive employers would take a bite or two, especially when they are proven wrong in a very public way. Eating humble pie should take the offender down a few pegs on a social or professional ladder, at least long enough to feel humbled or properly chastised for their overbearing behavior.

As our Chinese saying, older folks eat “more salt” than the young punk eating rice or drink milk and whether old or young, green or yellow, we all need to eat lots of humble pies and not behave high and almighty as come one day, all of us are going to perish and make sure humility rules our head and not trying to grow with big ego, self-esteem and cut out to be bossy….. unless you own the conglomerate company then no one would stop you from all kinds of unacceptable arrogant behavior but watch your step, as one day you will fall through the gap in no time.

Quotable quotes :

Words That Encourage Darkness and The Adversary: Angry, Antagonistic, Appetites, Arrogant, Confused, Contention, Covetous, Critical, Depressed, Domineering, Doubt, Easily Offended, Evasive, Fear, Frustrated, Harshness, Impatience, Ineffective, Irritable, Jealousy…..

Some people don't give up easily. When they're successful, this is called "perseverance." Before they succeed, or if they fail, it's called "stubborn," "bullheaded," "arrogant," or "foolish."

Nobody can be so amusingly arrogant as a young man who has just discovered an old idea and thinks it is his own.

What is wrong with us human beings, and has been wrong since time immemorial, is that without ever stating it in so many words, we believe that we have entered the realm of immortality. We behave as if we are never going to die - an infantile arrogance. But even more injurious than this sense of immortality is what comes with it : the sense that we can engulf this inconcievable universe with our minds.

Early in life, we had to choose between honest arrogance and hypocritical humility. We chose honest arrogance and have seen no occasion to change.

P/s:  This writing has no intent to pin point on any individual or youngster now out there with arrogant or almighty working style but if there is similarity in the writing that describes about any individual of whom then there is need of "self-reflection" and correcting himself or herself to be a betterself....... think this would have done them more good in bringing the message as there is a long way for these people to move in their working life....... :)

Horizon on Fire

The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig which caught fire few days back, lasted two days, then sank in 5,000 ft of water in the Gulf of Mexico. The rig belongs to Transocean. The rig was originally contracted through the year 2013 to BP and was working on BP’s Macondo exploration well when the fire broke out. The day rate for the rig costs about US$500K per day to contract. The complete drilling day cost, with helicopters and support vessels and other services, will cost closer to US$1 mil per day to operate drilling for oil and gas. The rig building cost about US$350 mil in 2001 and would probably double that if order one today with steel prices, material cost rising. The rig represents the cutting edge of drilling technology. It is a floating rig, capable of working in up to 3000m water depth. The rig is not moored as it would be too costly and too heavy to suspend this mooring load from the floating structure. There should be a cost study done to compare options of moored or DP and long term operational cost viability. This rig has a triple-redundant computer system uses satellite positioning to control powerful thrusters that keep the rig on station at all times. From web information, seems like the rig had apparently just finished cementing steel casing in place at depths exceeding 18,000 ft. The next operation was to suspend the well so that the rig could move to its next drilling location, the idea being that a rig would return to this well later in order to complete the work necessary to bring the well into production. Initial speculation news that was thought that somehow formation fluids –oil /gas –got into the wellbore and were undetected until it was too late to take action. Usually a “kick” would have been detected from the cabin monitoring controls. With a floating drilling semi-submersible, because it moves with the waves, currents and wind, the main pressure control equipment sits on the sub-seabed –the bottom point in the well is only part unmoved. There is a setup of ‘BOP’s” and controlled with redundant systems from the rig being laid just above the seabed. In the event of a serious emergency, this BOP tree will be shut and close against the well preventing back flow of the gas from seabed. Investigation will take some months before all of the reasons are known. The well still is apparently flowing oil, which is appearing at the surface as a slick. They have been working with remotely operated vehicles, or ROV’swhich are essentially tethered miniature submarines with manipulator arms and other equipment that can perform work underwater while the operator sits on a vessel. They have been trying to close the well in using a specialized port on the BOP and a pumping arrangement on their ROV’s. Seems to be unsuccessful so far. Specialized pollution control vessels have been scrambled to start working the spill, skimming the oil up. In the coming weeks there is another plan to move in one other rig ( could be from DD3 built by us ) to drill a fresh well that will intersect the blowing one at its pay zone. They will use technology that is capable of drilling from a floating rig, over 3 miles deep to an exact specific point in the earth –with a target radius of just a few feet plus or minus. Once they intersect their target, a heavy fluid will be pumped that exceeds the formation’s pressure, thus causing the flow to cease and rendering the well safe. Probably will take months to get this done, bringing all available offshore drilling technology to fruition. It will soon be an ecological and environment hazard if the well flows continuously and not stopped.

Subsea systems challenges :

Other challenges facing the rig operator of this kind of deep water drilling vessel relating to deepwater depth in several ways:

•The temperature at the seafloor is such that hydrate formation in any gas migrating to the BOP can freeze the system closed. Provision must be made to flush the connectors routinely with BOP operating fluid (which contains glycol) or as a last resort to inject methanol remotely from the ROV.

•The well pressure at approx 7,500 feet is 230 bar or 3,333 psi. All of the subsea BOP equipment must work in cold, dark, high pressure environment around one and a half miles from the vessel drill floor.

•The long column of drilling fluid in the riser exerts a pressure on the formation. In shallow water this pressure is usually far enough from the fracture pressure of the formation that cuttings can be transported out of the hole without exceeding the fracture pressure and invading the formation. This allows longer sections of hole to be drilled before second casing. As water depth increases the difficulty of keeping mud weights between fracture gradient and pore pressure causes an effective well design to include multiple casing strings driving up both the complexity and the cost of the well

•The marine riser itself must be strong enough to support choke and kill lines, boost lines, hydraulic lines, dual gradient lines and MUX cables and yet light enough to allow a combination of top tension and buoyancy to support it for a defined range of mud weights and vessel offsets.

•The time to run any piece of equipment to the seafloor is a significant part of the total operational time. It can take days to round trip the BOP in 7,500 feet of water and the rig is vulnerable to environmental extremes while the BOP is suspended below the rig

Below typical schematic of the subsea BOP control system which should be able to shut the well once activated. With so many cables and tubings going down the seabed, probably anything can go wrong during the Horizon emergency and Murphy's law set in, anything wrong goes.

Well Control

As a result, the design of the riser, its buoyancy, the BOP and sub-sea system is the most critical element of the overall design of the rig. The size and weight of a 21” riser and 18 ¾” 15K BOP system that dictates the overall size and therefore cost of the rig. Most deepwater operators are well aware of this and extensive research has been undertaken by them to find ways to allow smaller and less capable rigs to drill safely and effectively in the ultra deep water. These technologies include :-

•Dual density drilling – to solve the pressure differential problem referred to above.

•Slimbore wells to allow the use of 16” riser and a 13 5/8” BOP

•Expandable tubing to facilitate slim bore wells

•Free standing riser systems

•Artificially buoyant seabeds bringing the wellhead closer to the surface

All of these technologies hold future promise but they also represent compromises in the primary objective which is to deliver a quality high production well to the operator.

Horizon


With the Horizon rig going “under”, oil began gushing to the surface at an ever-increasing rate. In the worst case scenario, the daily outflow of oil is projected to reach as many as 60,000 barrels (2.5 million gallons) per day.

Some methods have been used for cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana coastline mess, both through working beneath the waves at 5,000 feet and atop, as the oil surfaced :-

Blowout preventer (Drilling term : BOP ) — In offshore oil industry, it’s an accepted fact that oil drilling rigs and platforms must be protect and prevent well kicks from the well beneath. Despite all safety precautions, there’s always the possibility of an accident that could potentially destroy the entire rig, just as happened with the Deepwater Horizon. But when that does happen, a separate device is supposed to prevent an oil leak at the bottom: the blowout preventer ( Maker like Cameron, Schaffer, Hydril are some of famous ones). For deepwater, subsea BOP is used and for shallow water like drilling jackup, surface BOP is used.

It was a bad luck that the BOP failed to activate. Other semi-submersible have been deployed to try to fix the device with help of ROVs ( remote operated vehicle ) or install a new BOP to stop the flow of oil at its lowest point, but have failed so far. It is not simple task to do it at deepsea where controls underwater are not easy with the temperature and current beneath.

Containment domes – These devices, also called coffer dams, are the second of the three major methods BP hopes will eventually stop or contain the leak by transferring the oil into FPSO. Starting with one this week, BP will lower three 40-foot tall containment “domes” over the leaking sections of pipe on the seabed. Some oil will still escape, but the plan is to suck most of it up through the dome (which is actually more of a rectangle). This idea also reveals the essential crudity of our deep-ocean technology: there’s nothing subtle about dropping just under a hundred tons of concrete onto a leaking pipe.

However, the effort to place a massive containment dome over a gushing underwater wellhead in the Gulf of Mexico was dealt a setback when a large volume of hydrates -- icelike crystals formed when gas combines with water -- accumulated inside the vessel, The dome was moved off to the side of the wellhead and is resting on the seabed while crews work to overcome the challenge

Relief wells — Even if the above two methods are successful, BP will still work on a relief well over the coming months that, when finally completed, will divert oil away from the spill site. Drilling the relief wells is a more involved process than the original well, because the drill bit must work at an angle once it penetrates the seabed. The company estimate its relief well will likely cost in the region of US$100 million.

Oil skimmers — Since some oil sits on top of the water, a clever skimming system can separate the oil to be siphoned away (and potentially even sold on the market like normal oil). Skimming devices can range from small to massive, but despite advances in the technology, none are large enough to deal with a Gulf-sized spill, at least without months of work.

Fire — One of the oldest technologies at least for gasoline, will burn off quickly and even explode. But the “sweet crude” welling up is actually a thick, heavy substance that doesn’t always burn easily or evenly. The Coast Guard attempted to burn enough oil to prevent it from reaching the Louisiana coastline, but failed.

Name: Deepwater Horizon

Reading & Bates Falcon RBS-8D
Owner: Transocean
Port of registry: Majuro
Marshall Islands
Route: Gulf of Mexico

Ordered: December 1998
Builder: Hyundai Heavy Industries

Cost: US$560 million [1][2]
Completed: 2001

Acquired: February 23, 2001

Maiden voyage: Ulsan, South Korea – Freeport, Texas
Out of service: April 21, 2010 (exploded)
Identification: ABS class no.: 0139290

Call sign: V7HC9
IMO number 8764597
General characteristics
Class and type: ABS +A1 DPS-3 Column Stabilized MODU
Tonnage: 32,588 t (32,073 LT; 35,922 ST)
Displacement: 52,587 t (51,756 LT; 57,967 ST)

Length: 112 m (367 ft)
Beam: 78 m (256 ft)
Height: 97.4 m (320 ft)
Draught: 23 m (75 ft)
Depth: 41.5 m (136 ft)

Installed power: 42 MW
Main Power 6 x Wartsila 18V32 rated 9775 hp each, driving 6 x ABB AMG 0900xU10 7000 kW 11,000 volts AC generators

Emergency Power 1 x Caterpillar 3408 DITA driving 1 x Caterpillar SR4 370 kW 480 volts AC generator
Power Distribution 8 x ABB Sami-Megastar Thruster Drives, 5.5 MW and 6 x GE Drilling Drive Lineups 600 V 12 MW
Deck Cranes 2 x Liebherr, 150 ft boom, 80 mt @ 35 ft
Thrusters 8 x Kamewa rated 7375 hp each, fixed propeller, full 360 deg azimuth
Speed: 4 kts
Crew: 146
Notes: 8202 tonne Variable Deck Load, DP Class 3, 8 thrusters, 10,000 ft drilling water depth

Video with courtesy of BP