Saturday, July 20, 2013

More about Offshore drilling .....

The present offshore drilling industry is involved in an unprecedented construction and drilling boom. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent to capture the much-needed energy supplies and offshore drilling activities around the world have never slowdown. The technology for drilling and producing in deeper waters and in more hostile environments have been rapidly and continuously expanding with better drilling tools and interphase software technology to enable safer and more productive when carrying out drilling and exploration.
With the advancement in technology, these factors have created an acute shortage of trained and qualified personnel to operate the rigs now under construction by various shipyards over the world. 

Offshore mobile drilling units as we know them today contained alot of sophisticated machineries for the running or drilling into the deep. However, in the old days, original units were simply land rigs taken into shallow waters and placed on a structure for drilling. The same drilling techniques that had been developed on land were used on the first offshore rigs. These techniques worked for some time, but the need to drill in deeper waters created a new type of offshore structural design. And along with the new engineering concepts came the new breed of drilling rigs which we see today.

Following offshore market trends, we find that there are basic types of offshore mobile drilling units: the submersible, the jack-up, the semisubmersible, and the drillship. 

The early breed of jack-ups was primarily designed to operate in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico area in water depths up to 200 feet. Wave heights in the range of 20 to 30 feet with winds up to 75 mph were considered as design criteria for these units. In most cases, in the event of a pending hurricane, the rigs were withdrawn
to sheltered areas. Today's jack-ups, however, are being used in international waters in a range of environmental conditions that many years ago were considered to be unrealistic. For example, a rig designed for 250-350 feet of water will have to meet the following range of criteria:
a. U.S. Gulf Coast- 50foot wave, 125 mph wind, minimal current.
b. North Sea- 75 foot wave, 115 mph wind, 1 to 2 knot current.
c. Southeast Asia- 30 foot wave, 100 mph wind, minimal current. 

As the water depth increases, the criteria rise accordingly and for 400 foot water depths the range becomes:
a. U.S. GulfCoast- 65 foot wave, 125 mph wind, 1 to 11/2knot current.
b. North Sea- 90 foot wave, 125 mph wind, 2 to 21/2knot current.
c. Southeast Asia- 50 foot wave, 115 mph wind, 1/2 to 1 knot current. 
Semi-submersibles permit drilling to be carried out in very deep waters and they are held on location either by a conventional mooring system or by dynamic positioning thrusters installed at the bottom of the floating pontoons. The conventional mooring system usually consists of 8 anchors placed in a spread pattern and connected to the hull by chain or wire rope, sometimes even a combination of both. The dynamic positioning method is an evolution of the ship sonar system whereby a signal is sent out from the floating vessel to transducers set out on the ocean floor. Dynamic positioning becomes a greater necessity as the water depth increases and is generally considered necessary in water depths beyond 1,000 feet. However, a semi-submersible in the past been contracted for 1,500 foot water depths using the anchor and chain method. Much of the necessary chain will be carried on supply vessels. Nowadays, semi-sub have enough capacity to carry such additional variable load without having to depend on supply vessels. 
Because of the submerged maps of the semisubmersible, rolling and pitching is of a low magnitude, The motion that causes problems for the semisubmersible is heave, or the vertical motion. Because of forces on the drill string when the vessel is heaving, the semisubmersible with a low heave response is considered to be the most suitable. Heave is generated in response to exposed waterplane and is expressed as   T =  2π/√(gt/D)   where T = time in seconds; t = tons per foot immersion; D =displacement in tons. 

Therefore, the smaller the waterplane area, or 't', the lower the heave response. This is achieved in the semisubmersible by submerging the lower hulls ( pontoon ) and floating at the column or caisson level. With the loss of waterplane area to reduce heave response, a reduction in stability follows. Designer must reach a compromise between acceptable heave response and adequate stability. There are, of course, other methods of reducing heave induced forces on drill string. 
In selecting a semisubmersible, it is therefore necessary to consider the following criteria:
a. Water depth.
b. Drilling depth requirement.
c. Environmental criteria.
d. Motion characteristics.
e. Consumables capacity.
f. .Mobility
Drillships
The last type of mobile drilling unit is the drillship. As the name implies, it is simply a shipshape vessel used for drilling purposes. Earlier drillships were converted vessels, either barges, ore carriers, tankers, or supply vessels. However, although conversions are still being done, there are now many advanced drillships being designed purely for drilling, such as the earlier ones Glomar Challenger or the Offshore Discoverer. Drillships are the most mobile of all drilling units, but they are the least productive. The very configuration that permits mobility results in very bad drilling capabilities. Drillships are being used extensively in the U.S. Gulf Coast to bridge the gap between the jack-up and the semisubmersible.
However, it is the drillship that has drilled in the deepest water, over 1,000 feet ( now 10 times the depth capability). As discussed earlier, heave is the major problem when using a floating vessel. The drillship, because of its surface contact with the sea, develops very large heave response compared to the semisubmersible. It is possible, by means of stabilizing tanks and other methods, to reduce roll on drills hips but heave cannot be reduced. A subsequent increase in "rig downtime" or "lost" time occurs. Because of this there is a bigger demand for the use of compensation devices.
Mooring for drillships is very similar to the methods previously discussed for semisubmersibles. However, there is one additional system that has been developed on a drillship-the "Turret" system. 

http://kimwhye.blogspot.sg/2012/08/offshore-drillship-design-and-building.html




                           (Source : Youtube )














Sunday, July 14, 2013

China shipbuilders yet to recover from setback while singapore yards still in good shape



With the last few years of shipbuilding and global economy downturn, 2013 we see the global economy with mild recovery but the shipbuilding industry still set with some China big players facing severe credit crunch and some are well-established with strong fundamental chinese shipbuilders. Cosco's share price has plunged 28 per cent to 74 cents while Yangzijiang was down 25.4 per cent to 85 cents as of this month, while they contended with the shipbuilding downturn in China and now the credit squeeze in the mainland banking system.
Going by the gloomy forecasts from analysts on the sector, these Chinese shipbuilders' fortunes may not change for the better any time soon ( while I hold some shares of Cosco two years ago, seems likely it will not be any sooner to see sign of "ROI" with the small sum being set aside to this counter.. . :(   
One long, dark shadow is being cast by another fellow shipbuilder Hong Kong-listed China Rongsheng - once billed as the biggest shipbuilder in the world in terms of tonnage of orders on hand - which faces the grim prospect of insolvency. It has gotten workers to take "holidays" and even had to borrow money from its founder to stave off a cash crunch.

RS also had to contend with laid-off workers who formed a blockade outside the company's Nantong shipyard over a wage dispute, even as it tried to fend off other problems such as a lack of orders this year. Its woeful tale provides a cautionary lesson for investors on the problems plaguing China shipbuilders. China Rongsheng Heavy Industries Group, China's largest private shipbuilder, appealed for financial help from the Chinese government and big shareholders on Friday after cutting its workforce and delaying payments to suppliers.
Analysts said the company could be the biggest casualty of a local shipbuilding industry suffering from overcapacity and shrinking orders amid a global shipping downturn. New ship orders for Chinese builders fell by about half last year.

Hours after China Rongsheng made its appeal in a filing to the Hong Kong stock exchange, where the company is listed, Beijing vowed to bring about the orderly closure of some factories in industries plagued by overcapacity. The statement by the State Council, or cabinet, laid out broad plans to ensure banks support the kind of economic rebalancing Beijing wants as it looks to focus more on high-end manufacturing. It did not mention any specific industries or companies and there was no suggestion it was referring to Rongsheng.

RS said it was expecting a net loss for the six months that ended June 30 from a year earlier, according to the filing. The company reported a net loss of 572.6 million yuan ($93.47 million) in 2012, its worst-ever, despite getting government subsidies of 1.27 billion yuan in that year, its latest annual report shows. It's shares plunged 16 percent to a record low in heavy turnover on Friday, leaving its market capitalisation at just under $1 billion.

Some Investment Research think that Cosco with its large debt burden will be vulnerable. The group's net gearing climbed to 131 per cent as at the end of the first quarter from just 10 per cent at the end of 2010. Cosco's existing $3.4 billion debt would need to be refinanced within the next 12 months. The yard's  free cash flow is also likely to remain negative for the next few years, due to its low net profit margin and increasingly back-end loaded contracts in its order book..

However, one analyst believes that the stress on the Chinese shipbuilding industry from the slowdown in vessel orders may not affect all shipbuilders in the same way. On the flipside, signs of instability at a yard can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, as shipowners withhold progress payments if there is concern that the yard cannot complete the order. As of the first quarter, Yangzijiang's order book was US$3.3 billion, 75 per cent of which is in container vessels. In our view, Yangzijiang's ability to produce high quality, large container vessels and a strong balance sheet with 11 billion yuan in new cash and financial assets makes it a long-term winner in the shipbuilding industry.

By contrast, another Chinese shipbuilder, Singapore-listed Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd, has secured total orders of $1 billion in the first half, Barclays said.
While the Chinese shipbuilding industry faced "unprecedented challenges", China Rongsheng's board was confident management could ease pressure on working capital in the near future and maintain normal operations, the company said in the filing.
The Chinese government has been trying to support the domestic shipping industry since the 2008 financial crisis, and local media reports said this week Beijing was considering policies to revive the shipbuilding business.
The holding orders of Chinese shipyards dropped 23 percent in the first five months of this year compared with a year earlier, according to the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry. New orders dropped to a seven-year low in 2012. ($1=6.1258 yuan)

Following the setting up of YOEPL, together with one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Jiangsu Yangzijiang 

Shipbuilding Co. Ltd (“Jiangsu Yangzijiang”), another new subsidiary named Jiangsu Yangzijiang Offshore Engineering Co., Ltd (“JYOEC”) was set up in Taicang.  On 3 December 2012, JYOEC secured its maiden offshore contract – a Jackup Drilling Rig worth US$170 million. 

Some of YZJ other recent ventures that extend on shipbuilding capabilities include steel fabrication for building facades of petrochemical plants, energy equipment manufacturing as well as other non-shipbuilding activities. 
Beyond shipbuilding and its related activities, they have developed supplementary income streams from conservatively managed businesses such as low-risk financial investments. They also leveraged on strong balance sheet to assist ship owners in ship finance and lease vessels for income. 
YZJ currently manage more than Rmb 11 billion of financial assets that are over and above its Rmb 2 billion cash reserve, which is held for working capital, expansion and dividend payment needs. 

Having supplementary income streams puts them in the favorable position of being able to be selective on shipbuilding contracts during downturns. That means they need not enter contracts on compromised terms and conditions. They expect the shipbuilding environment to remain difficult in 2013 and intend to deliver 42 vessels in 2013, which is lower than the 51 vessels done in 2012. 


The poor shipbuilding market has proven to be an opportunity for YZJ to become more client-oriented and competitive. They will focus on developing vessels that meet ship-owners’ needs and focus on large vessels, for which there is greater demand.  Even though faced with stiff competition as many other shipyards are likewise trying to enter this sector to mitigate the shipbuilding downturn, they will not easily take orders with unfavorable terms just to secure contracts. 

Rather, they intend to secure offshore orders selectively, and work towards a good track record of timely and successful deliveries. During the downturn, they will seize opportunities to generate additional income streams through joint ventures with established players in low-risk business sectors that are synergistic with their Group’s development. 


OIL rig-building yards in China may offer lower prices and more attractive financing, but Keppel Fels remains unfazed by talk of keener competition and tighter margins. The world’s largest rig-builder has its own competitive edge – on-time delivery and costs that are kept within budget.

Keppel Fels told The Straits Times: “Look at our orders. The Chinese story has been there for at least two years now, but today, we’re still getting our B Class orders. This year alone, when the Chinese have been playing in full swing, we’ve already got eight jack-ups. ”
This year, Keppel Fels is delivering a record 20 rigs, well over the previous peak of 13 seen in 2009. http://kimwhye.blogspot.sg/2013/02/keppel-handover-first-few-of-twenty.html

Our Tuas yard was abuzz with activity during a recent visit by The Straits Times, with workers clocking overtime hours and the building docks fully occupied. This amid reports of widespread job layoffs at Chinese shipyards even as they diversify into rig-building to offset their ship order slump. There has also been the recent credit crunch on the mainland.

The B Class is Keppel’s signature rig and is its most popular design. Since 2010, its B Class rigs have accounted for about 45 per cent of the total number ordered among rigs of its class globally. Developed by its technology arm and launched in 2000, the rig is able to operate in water depths of up to 120m and drill to depths of 9,000m.
http://kimwhye.blogspot.sg/2013/04/the-61st-b-class-jackup-ordered-since.html

We just delivered its 45th B Class rig recently – a fitting milestone given that this year is parent company The rig was delivered to Arabian Drilling Company (ADC) 14 days ahead of schedule,  on budget and with a perfect safety record. Keppel FELS was awarded an early delivery bonus of US$210,000. Named ArabDrill 50 at a ceremony yesterday, the rig will be chartered to Saudi Aramco for operations in offshore Saudi Arabia. The innovative and cost-effective KFELS B Class jackup rig has proven to be the trusted, reliable workhorse of the industry, and has performed excellently in major offshore exploration and development programmes in various locations worldwide. It has been employed by some 20 international drilling operators in over 15 countries. With usage rates calculated on a daily basis, and costing about US$150,000 to US$190,000 a day, having a more efficient rig can result in cost savings of several million dollars per drilling project. This could amount to many more millions of dollars, if one considers that the lifespan of a rig is typically at least 20 years.

http://kimwhye.blogspot.sg/2010/10/insights-of-jack-up-drilling-rig.html
http://kimwhye.blogspot.sg/2011/09/more-on-drilling-jack-up-and-some-of.html

Sunday, July 7, 2013

More notes on Marine, Electrical and Piping technical know-how for marine engineers


At any one time in a rig or vessel's machinery space there will be a considerable variety of liquids on the move. The lengths of pipework will cover many kilometres, the systems are often interconnecting and most pumps are in pairs. The engineer must be familiar with each system from one end to the other, knowing the location and use of every single valve. The various systems perform functions such as cooling, heating, cleaning and lubricating of the various items of machinery. Each system can be considered comprised of a set of pumps, piping, valves and fittings, which could be controlled or bypass if they are redundancy in place in the design. 

A rig or vessel's machinery space contains hundreds of metres of piping and fittings. The various systems are arranged to carry many different liquids at various temperatures and pressures. The influences of operational and safety requirements, as well as legislation, result in somewhat complicated arrangements of what are a few basic fittings. Valves, strainers, branch pipes, etc., are examples of fittings which are found in a pipe system.
Pipes Machinery space pipework is made up of assorted straight lengths and bends joined by flanges with an appropriate gasket or joint between, or very small-bore piping may use compression couplings or socket welded. The piping material will be chosen to suit the liquid carried and the system conditions. Where piping is to be galvanised, the completed pipe with all joints fully welded is to be hot dipped galvanised or in some cases the welded joints could be cold galvanised touch up if the quality and standard permit. 

Mud boxes are fitted into the machinery space bilge suction piping. The mud box is a coarse strainer with a straight tailpipe down to the bilge. To enable the internal perforated plate to be cleaned when necessary, the lid of the mud box is easily removed without disconnecting any pipework.
Suction pipes in tanks should be arranged with a bell mouth or foot. The bell end or foot should provide an inlet area of about one-and-a-half times the pipe area. It should also be a sufficient distance from the bottom plating and nearby structure to provide a free suction area, again about one-and-a-half times the pipe area. 

The bilge main is arranged to drain any watertight compartment other than ballast, oil or water tanks and to discharge the contents overboard. The number of pumps and their capacity depend upon the size, type
and service of the vessel. All bilge suctions must be fitted with suitable strainers, which in the machinery space would be mud boxes positioned at floorplate level for easy access. A vertical drop pipe would lead down to the bilge.  The emergency bilge suction or bilge injection valve is used to prevent flooding of the ship. It is a direct suction from the machinery space bilge which is connected to the largest capacity pump or pumps. An emergency bilge pump is required for passenger ships but may also be fitted as an extra on cargo ships. It must be a completely independent unit capable of operating even if submerged. 

The ballast system is arranged to ensure that water can be drawn from any rig ballast tank or the sea and discharged to any other tank or the sea as required to trim the vessel. Combined or separate mains for suction and discharge may be provided. Where a tank or cargo space can be used for ballast or dry cargo then either a ballast or bilge connection will be required. The system must therefore be arranged so that only the appropriate pipeline is in service; the other must be securely blanked off.

Domestic water systems usually comprise a fresh water system for washing and drinking and a salt water system for sanitary purposes. Both use a basically similar arrangement of an automatic pump supplying the liquid to a tank which is pressurised by compressed air. The compressed air provides the head or pressure to supply the water when required. The pump is started automatically by a pressure switch which operates as the water level falls to a predetermined level. The fresh water system has, in addition, a calorifier or heater which is heated, usually with steam. 






Some of the marine equipment in the machinery space is dedicated to servicing the ship in general and providing amenities for personnel or passengers. Thus the bilge system is available to clear oil/water leakage and residues from machinery and other spaces as well as to provide an emergency pumping capability. The domestic water and sewage systems provide amenities for personnel

Bilge systems and oily/water separators
The essential purpose of a bilge system, is to clear water from the ship's 'dry' compartments, in emergency. The major uses of the system, are for clearing water and oil which accumulates in machinery space bilges as the result of leakage or draining, and when washing down dry cargo holds. The bilge main in the engine room, has connections from dry cargo holds, tunnel and machinery spaces. Tanks for liquid cargo and ballast are served by cargo discharge systems and ballast systems respectively. They are not connected to
the bilge system unless they have a double function, as for example with deep tanks that are used for dry cargo or ballast. Spectacle blanks or change over chests are fitted to connect/isolate spaces of this kind where necessary.

Oil/water separators
Oil/water separators are necessary aboard vessels to prevent the discharge of oil overboard mainly when pumping out bilges. They also find service when deballasting or when cleaning oil tanks. The requirement to fit such devices is the result of international legislation. Legislation was needed because free oil
and oily emulsions discharged in a waterway can interfere with natural processes such as photosynthesis and re-aeration, and induce the destruction of the algae and plankton so essential to fish life. Inshore discharge of oil can cause damage to bird life and mass pollution of beaches. Ships found discharging water containing more than 100 mg/litre of oil or discharging more than 60 litres of oil per nautical mile can be heavily fined, as also can the ship's Master.

Oil content monitoring
In the past, an inspection glass, fitted in the overboard discharge pipe of the oil/water separator permitted sighting of the flow. The discharge was illuminated by a light bulb fitted on the outside of the glass port opposite the viewer. The separator was shut down if there was any evidence of oil carry over, but problems with observation occurred due to poor light and accumulation of oily deposits on the inside of the glasses.
Present-day monitors are based on the same principle. However, whilst the eye can register anything from an emulsion to globules of oil a light-sensitive photo-cell detector cannot. Makers may therefore use a sampling and mixing pump to draw a representative sample with a general opaqueness more easily registered by the simple photo-cell monitor. Flow through the sampling chamber is made rapid to reduce deposit on glass lenses. They are easily removed for cleaning.
Bilge or ballast water passing through a sample chamber can be monitored by a strong light shining through it and onto a photocell. Light reaching the cell decreases with increasing oil content of the water. The effect of this light on the photo-cell compared with that of direct light on the reference cell to the left of the bulb, can be registered on a meter calibrated to show oil content.






Waste heat losses arise both from equipment inefficiencies and from thermodynamic limitations on equipment and processes. For example, consider reverberatory furnaces frequently used in aluminum melting operations. Exhaust gases immediately leaving the furnace can have temperatures as high as 2,200-2,400°F [1,200-1,300°C]. Consequently, these gases have high-heat content, carrying away as much as 60% of furnace energy inputs. Efforts can be made to design more energy-efficient reverberatory furnaces with better heat transfer and lower exhaust temperatures; however, the laws of thermodynamics place a lower limit on the temperature of exhaust gases. Since heat exchange involves energy transfer from a high-temperature source to a lower-temperature sink, the combustion gas temperature must always exceed the molten aluminum temperature in order to facilitate aluminum melting. The gas temperature in the furnace will never decrease below the temperature of the molten aluminum, since this would violate the second law of thermodynamics. Therefore, the minimum possible temperature of combustion gases immediately exiting an aluminum reverberatory furnace corresponds to the aluminum pouring point temperature 1,200-1,380°F [650-750°C]. In this scenario, at least 40% of the energy input to the furnace is still lost as waste heat.

Some general considerations for waste heat recovery design are:

1. All waste heat recovery options, if installed, should be done with full consideration of:
– Simplicity of operations
– Ease of maintenance
– Prevention of corrosion
– Proven technology

2. Dewpoint and corrosion of waste heat recovery equipment.
The dewpoint of the flue gas in waste heat recovery is very critical to the efficient operation and maintenance of boilers, fired heaters, gas turbines, and heat recovery steam generators. At temperatures below the dewpoint, sulfuric acid condenses on surfaces and corrodes the metal. At temperatures above the dewpoint, corrosion is not a problem. Accordingly, each project must select the optimum exit temperature and the
appropriate alloys to maximize the efficiency and minimize corrosion. 

Advantages:
These systems have many benefits which could be direct or indirect.
  • Direct benefits: The recovery process will add to the efficiency of the process and thus decrease the costs of fuel and energy consumption needed for that process.
  • Indirect benefits:
  1. Reduction in Pollution: Thermal and air pollution will dramatically decrease since less flue gases of high temperature are emitted from the plant since most of the energy is recycled.
  2. Reduction in the equipment sizes: As Fuel consumption reduces so the control and security equipment for handling the fuel decreases. Also, filtering equipment for the gas is no longer needed in large sizes.
  3. Reduction in auxiliary energy consumption: Reduction in equipment sizes means another reduction in the energy fed to those systems like pumps, filters, fans,...etc.
Disadvantages:
  • Capital cost: The capital cost to implement a waste heat recovery system may outweigh the benefit gained in heat recovered. It is necessary to put a cost to the heat being offset.
  • Quality of heat: Often waste heat is of low quality (temperature). It can be difficult to efficiently utilize the quantity of low quality heat contained in a waste heat medium. Heat exchangers tend to be larger to recover significant quantities which increases capital cost.

Waste heat recovery systems are frequently implemented, but constrained by factors such as temperature limits and costs of recovery equipment.
There are a number of cases where heat recovery equipment is installed, but the quantity of heat recovered does not match the full recovery potential. Key barriers include heat exchanger material limits and costs for extending recovery to lower-temperature and higher-temperature regimes.

• Most unrecovered waste heat is at low temperatures.
The waste heat streams analyzed in this study showed that roughly 60% of unrecovered waste heat is low quality (i.e., at temperatures below 450°F [232°C]). While low-temperature waste heat has less thermal and economic value than high-temperature heat, it is ubiquitous and available in large quantities. Comparison of total work potential from different waste heat sources showed that the magnitude of low-temperature waste heat is sufficiently large that it should not be neglected in pursuing RD&D opportunities for waste heat recovery. New technologies are developing that may provide significant opportunities for low-temperature heat recovery. 






The complete electrical plant on board vessel or rig is made up of power generation equipment, a distribution system and the many power utilising devices. Electricity is used for the motor drive of many auxiliaries and also for deck machinery, lighting, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, etc. A constant supply of electricity is essential for safe rig and machinery operation, and therefore standby or additional capacity is necessary together with emergency supply equipment. Emergency equipment may take the form of an automatically starting emergency alternator or storage batteries may be used. The complete range of electrical equipment will include generators, switch gear for control and distribution, motors and their associated starting equipment and emergency supply arrangements. 

Alternating current AC has now all but replaced direct current as the standard supply for all marine  offshore installations. The use of alternating current has a number of important advantages: for example, reduced first cost, less weight, less space required and a reduction in maintenance requirements. Direct current does, however, offer advantages in motor control using, for example, the Ward-Leonard system which provides a wide range of speed. 

Example, Motors rated 200 HP and above are often wound for Medium Voltage (2300VAC or 4160 VAC) instead of Low Voltage (480 VAC to 600 VAC).  Above 1000 HP it is difficult to find motors that are not wound for Medium Voltage.  There are many reasons why you should consider the use of a Low Voltage AC Drive with an Input and Output Isolation Transformer instead of a Medium Voltage AC Drive.
First Cost:
Even if you own an existing motor wound for 2300 VAC or 4160 VAC your first cost to install a Low Voltage AC Drive with an Input and Output Isolation Transformer will typically be lower than your first cost to install a Medium Voltage AC Drive.  If your Input Voltage is 2300 VAC or 4160 VAC you are going to need an Isolation Transformer.  Medium Voltage AC Drive suppliers always require an Isolation Transformer to protect the AC Motor from high voltage transients.  The cost of a 4160 VAC to 480 VAC Step Down Input Isolation Transformer is no more expensive than the cost of a 4160 VAC to 4160 VAC Input Isolation Transformer.
Medium Voltage AC Drives are not inexpensive.  The cost of a typical Low Voltage AC Drive and an Output (Step-Up) Isolation Transformer is typically only 50% to 75% of the cost of a Medium Voltage AC Drive.  Why you might ask?  First of all, semiconductor technology still favors higher current at a lower voltage over lower current at a higher voltage. Second, there are relatively few Medium Voltage AC Drives manufactured.  The manufacturing process for a Medium Voltage AC Drive still involves a good deal of custom engineering and manufacturing.  Low Voltage AC Drives (even 1000 HP Low Voltage Drives) are more of a production line product.  Third, there are just more suppliers of Low Voltage AC Drives.  The competition is more intense and the prices are more competitive.
Size:
The physical size of a Medium Voltage AC Drive and Input Isolation Transformer is typically 125% to 150% larger than the size of a typical Low Voltage AC Drive with Input and Output Isolation Transformers.  Medium Voltage AC Drives are often constructed in their own walk in enclosures.
Service and Repair:
Plant Maintenance generally has a healthy fear of Medium Voltage applications.  They are usually quite comfortable with Medium Voltage Transformers and Medium Voltage Motors.  They are less comfortable with Medium Voltage Switchgear and Medium Voltage AC Motor Starters.  Medium Voltage AC Drives are very complex products, much more complex than a Medium Voltage AC Motor Starter.  Most Plant Maintenance Engineers are not comfortable with Medium Voltage AC Drives.  Medium Voltage AC Drives are almost always Installed, Started Up, Repaired, and Maintained by the manufacturer’s Field Service Engineer.  This can become very expensive and it leaves you at the mercy of the manufacturer.  A Low Voltage AC Drive with Input and Output Isolation Transformers is a product that your maintenance staff will feel comfortable with

Motors and generators, both d.c. and a.c., are rated as Continuous Maximum Rated (CMR) machines. This means they can accept a considerable momentary overload and perhaps even a moderate overload for a longer duration. Temperature affects the performance of all electrical equipment and also the useful life of the insulation and thus the equipment itself. The total temperature of an operating machine is a result of the ambient air temperature and the heating effect of current in the windings, Temperature rise is measured above this total temperature. Adequate ventilation of electrical equipment is therefore essential. Classification Societies have set requirements for the various classes of insulation. The usual classes for marine installations are E, B and F where particular insulation materials are specified and increasing temperature rises allowed in the order stated. 

An a.c. distribution system is provided from the main switchboard which is itself supplied by the alternators. The voltage at the switchboard is usually 440 volts, but on some large installations it may be as high as 3300 volts. Power is supplied through circuit breakers to larger auxiliaries at the high voltage. Smaller equipment may be supplied via fuses or miniature circuit breakers. Lower voltage supplies used, for instance, for lighting at 220 volts, are supplied by step down transformers in the distribution network.
The distribution system will be three-wire with insulated or earthed neutral. The insulated neutral has largely been favoured, but earthed neutral systems have occasionally been installed. The insulated neutral system can suffer from surges of high voltage as a result of switching or system faults which could damage machinery. Use of the earthed system could result in the loss of an essential service such as the steering gear as a result of an earth fault. An earth fault on the insulated system would not, however, break the supply and would be detected in the earth lamp display. Insulated systems have therefore been given preference since earth faults are a common occurrence on ships and a loss of supply in such situations cannot be accepted. 

The operation of paralleling two alternators requires the voltages to be equal and also in phase. The alternating current output of any machine is always changing, so for two machines to operate together their voltages must be changing at the same rate or frequency and be reaching their maximum (or any other value) together. They are then said to be 'in phase'. Use is nowadays made of a synchroscope when paralleling two a.c. machines. The synchroscope has two windings which are connected one to each side of the paralleling switch. A pointer is free to rotate and is moved by the magnetic effect of the two windings. When the two voltage supplies are in phase the pointer is stationary in the 12 o'clock position. If the pointer is rotating then a frequency difference exists and the dial is marked for clockwise rotation FAST and anti-clockwise rotation SLOW, the reference being to the incoming machine frequency.
To parallel an incoming machine to a running machine therefore it is necessary to ensure firstly that both voltages are equal Voltmeters are provided for this purpose. Secondly the frequencies must be brought into phase. In practice the synchroscope usually moves slowly in the FAST direction and the paralleling switch is closed as the pointer reaches the 11 o'clock position. This results in the incoming machine immediately accepting a small amount of load. 

In the event of a main generating system failure an emergency supply of electricity is required for essential services. This can be supplied by batteries, but most vessel or rigs have an emergency generator. The
unit is diesel driven and located outside of the machinery space. The emergency generator must be rated to provide power for the driving motors of the emergency bilge pump, fire pumps, steering gear, watertight doors and possibly fire fighting equipment. Essential services such as Emergency lighting for occupied areas, navigation lights, communications systems and alarm systems must also be supplied. Where electrical control devices are used in the operation of main machinery, these too may require a supply from the emergency generator.
A switchboard in the emergency generator room supplies these various loads. It is not usual for an emergency generator to require paralleling, so no equipment is provided for this purpose. Automatic start up of the emergency generator at a low voltage value is usual on modern installations. 

The automatic provision of electrical power to meet varying load demands can be achieved by performing the following functions automatically:
1. Prime mover start up.
2. Synchronising of incoming machine with bus-bars.
3. Load sharing between alternators,
4. Safety and operational checks on power supply and equipment in operation.
5. Unloading, stopping and returning to standby of surplus machines.
6. Preferential tripping of non-essential loads under emergency conditions and their reinstating when acceptable. 

A loading in excess of each power generator will result in the start up and synchronising of another generator machine. Should the load fall to a value where a running machine is unnecessary it will be unloaded, stopped and returned to the standby condition. If the system should overload through some fault, such as a machine not starting, an alarm will be given and preferential tripping will occur of non-essential loads. Should the system totally fail the emergency alternator will start up and supply essential services and lighting through its switchboard.





Over recent years, there has been a significant increase in the installation and use of power electronic equipment onboard ships and on offshore installations. The operation of this equipment has in many cases significantly degraded the ship or offshore installation electrical power quality to such an extent that measures have to be implemented in order to minimize the resultant adverse effects on the electrical plant and equipment.
The quality and security of voltage supplies are important to the safety of any vessel and its crew and to the protection of the marine environment. Any failure or malfunction of equipment such as propulsion or navigation systems can result in an accident at sea or close inshore with serious consequences. Many power quality issues are transient, for example, the starting of a large electric thruster motor resulting in a momentary dip before the generator regulators correct the situation and reinstate the correct level of voltage and frequency.
The harmonic distortion of voltage supplies caused by the operation of electronic devices which draw nonlinear (i.e., non-sinusoidal in nature) currents from the voltage supplies, the same items of “nonlinear” equipment can also be affected by harmonic currents and the subsequent voltage distortion they produce, as can the majority of “linear” equipment (particularly generators, AC motors and transformers). As harmonic distortion is “steady state” and continuous, the issue of electrical power quality associated with harmonics is an important concern to the marine safety aspects and in addition, to any adverse effects harmonic distortion has on the performance and reliability of the majority of marine and offshore systems and equipment.

“Linear” equipment, such as generators, AC motors and transformers, is also known to produce harmonics,
albeit in limited qualities compared to large “nonlinear loads”. However, in the context of the marine and offshore installations, it is the electric variable speed drive (a combination of an electric motor and electronic power converter) whether AC or DC based, which, due to its increased popularity in a host of applications, is the main source of harmonic currents and subsequent voltage distortion.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, AC variable frequency drives (“VFDs” or “inverters”) were developed in various forms, “quasi square wave drives” and “current source drives”, being two common examples. However, it was only in the late 1980s that AC drive technology (most notably in the form of “pulse width modulation” (“PWM”) drives) started to appear on ships in any numbers, although they were installed on offshore oil production installations from the mid 1980s for a few duties, especially including down-hole pumps, where the initial benefit was as “soft-starters” for the pumps. Shortly thereafter, the speed control feature was utilized as oil reservoirs became depleted and flow rate had to be controlled.
Offshore, on applications where robust, variable speed control was needed, DC SCR drives were most
common. DC SCR drives went largely unchallenged until the early-to-mid 1990s. However, from that time on, as the physical size, performance, reduction in maintenance of AC motors compared to DC motors, cost, and reliability of AC drives continued to improve, their popularity increased making AC drives comparable to DC SCR drives.

The harmful effects of harmonic voltages and currents on transformer performance often go unnoticed until an actual failure occurs. In some instances, transformers that have operated satisfactorily for long periods have failed in a relatively short time when plant loads were changed or a facility's electrical system was reconfigured. Changes could include installation of variable frequency drives, electronic ballasts, power factor improvement capacitors, arc furnaces, and the addition or removal of large motors.
Many industrial and commercial electrical systems have capacitors installed to offset the effect of low power factor. Most capacitors are designed to operate at a maximum of 110% of rated voltage and at 135% of their kVAR ratings. In a power system characterized by large voltage or current harmonics, these limitations are frequently exceeded, resulting in capacitor bank failures. Since capacitive reactance is inversely proportional to frequency, unfiltered harmonic currents in the power system find their way into capacitor banks, These banks act like a sink, attracting harmonic currents, thereby becoming overloaded.
A more serious condition, with potential for substantial damage, occurs as a result of harmonic resonance. Resonant conditions are created when the inductive and capacitive reactances become equal in an electrical system. Resonance in a power system may be classified as series or parallel resonance, depending on the configuration of the resonance circuit. Series resonance produces voltage amplification and parallel resonance causes current multiplication within an electrical system. In a harmonic rich environment, both types of resonance are present. During resonant conditions, if the amplitude of the offending frequency is large, considerable damage to capacitor banks would result. And, there is a high probability that other electrical equipment on the system would also be damaged.





Sunday, June 30, 2013

Ships and Rig stability for non Naval Architect

If the shell of the ship or offshore rig's pontoon or hull is damaged such as to open one or more
internal spaces or compartments to the sea, flow will take place between the sea and these spaces until stable equilibrium is established or until the ship sinks or capsizes. The loss of watertight integrity could be due to collision, grounding or internal accident such as an explosion. It is impractical to design a ship to withstand any possible damage. The degree to which a vessel approaches this limit is the true index of its safety. To reduce the probability of loss, the hull is divided into a series of watertight compartments by means of transverse watertight bulkheads extending from side to side of the ship.

It is true that the more severe the standard adopted for subdivision and stability, the greater the probability that capital and operating costs will be increased. For example, too close spacing of bulkheads may unnecessarily increase both the first cost and operating costs and may also seriously restrict the vessel’s usefulness. In addition, it might be expected that the more bulkheads the safer the ship. But damage may occur entirely between adjacent bulkheads or may involve one or more bulkheads. Hence, for a given length of damage, any increase in the number of bulkheads may actually increase the likelihood of bulkhead damage, which would reduce rather than increase the chances of survival.

The General Effects of Flooding:


(1) Change of Draft

The draft will change so that the displacement of the remaining unflooded part of the ship is equal to the displacement of the ship before damage less the weight of any liquids which were in the space opened to the sea.

(2) Change of Trim

The ship will trim until the centre of buoyancy of the remaining unflooded part of the ship lies in a transverse plane through the ship’s or rig's centre of gravity and perpendicular to the equilibrium waterplane.

(3) Heel

If the flooded space is unsymmetrical with respect to the centerline, the ship will heel until the centre of buoyancy of the remaining unflooded part of the ship lies in a fore-and –aft plane through the ship’s centre of gravity and perpendicular to the equilibrium waterline. If the GM in the flooded condition is negative, the flooded ship will be unstable in the upright condition , and even though the flooded space is symmetrical, the ship or semi-sub will either heel until a stable heeled condition is reachedor capsize. Trim and heel may result in further flooding through immersion of openings bulkheads, side shell or decks (downflooding).

(4) Change of Stability

Flooding changes both the transverse and longitudinal stability. The initial metacentric height is given by:

GM = KB + BM - KG

Sinkage results in an increase in KB. If there is sufficient trim, there may also be an appreciable further increase in KB as a result. BM tends to decrease because of the loss of the moment of inertia of the flooded part of the waterplane. However, sinkage usually results in an increase in the moment of inertia of the undamaged part of the waterplane, thus tending to compensate for the loss. Also, trim by the stern usually increases the transverse moment of inertia of the undamaged waterplane, and vice versa. For most ocean-going ships the combined effect of these factors is usually a net decrease in GM.

(5) Change of Freeboard

The increase in draft after flooding results in a decrease in the amount of freeboard. Even though the residual GM may be positive, if the freeboard is minimal and the waterline is close to the deck edge, submerging the deck edge at small angles of heel greatly reduces the range of positive righting arm GZ, and leaves the vessel vulnerable to the forces of wind and sea.

(6 ) Loss of Ship or Rig

Where changes in draft, trim and/or heel necessary to attain stable equilibrium are such as to immerse non-watertight portions of a ship, equilibrium will not be reached because of progressive flooding and the ship will sink either with or without capsizing.

Where the maximum GZ in the damaged condition is adequate and where the immersion of non-tight portions of the ship only results in slow extension of flooding, sinking may be quite slow. In such cases, control measures aimed at stopping progressive flooding, either by reducing heel, pumping leakage water or fitting emergency means of checking the flow of water or a combination of such measures may be successful. Therefore, it has been realized that providing the master with an instruction manual outlining damage control measures available to minimize flooding would be a valuable contribution to safety.


Floatation Calculations :

In order to assess the ship’s or rig's ability to withstand damage, it is necessary to determine:

(a) The damaged waterline, i.e. the new draft, trim and heel.
(b) The damage stability, i.e. after flooding.

The floatation calculations can be carried out by either one of two methods, the lost buoyancy method or the added weight method.

1. The Lost Buoyancy Method

In this method the lost buoyancy due to a compartment or compartments being opened to the sea is calculated. This lost buoyancy and its moments are equated to the buoyancy gain and moments accompanying sinkage, trim and heel of the remaining intact part of the ship. In this method, it is assumed that the displacement and the position of the centre of gravity are unchanged.

This procedure is convenient and simple to use if the form of the vessel and configuration of the flooded space are such that the resulting sinkage, trim and heel do not involve extreme or discontinuous changes in the remaining undamaged part of the waterline. Consequently, this procedure is often used for merchant ships.

Compartments of ship  or rig open to the sea do not fill totally with water because some space is already occupied by structure, machinery or cargo. The ratio of the volume which can be occupied by water to the total gross volume is called the permeability μ. For cargo spaces it is taken as 60%, for accommodation spaces as 95% and for machinery spaces as 85%.

The steps of this method are as follows:

1. Calculate the permeable volume of compartment up to the original waterline.
2. Calculate TPC, longitudinal and lateral positions of CF for the waterplane with the damaged area removed.
3. Calculate revised second moments of areas of the waterplane about the CF in the two directions and hence new BMs.
4. Calculate parallel sinkage and rise of CB due to the vertical transfer of buoyancy from the flooded compartment to the layer.
5. Calculate new GMs.
6. Calculate angles of rotation due to the eccentricity of the loss of buoyancy from the new CFs.

 
Semi-sub advantages
§ motion characteristics suited to most (but not all) ocean conditions
§ provides a stable platform for drilling and completion operations
§ Semi-sub disadvantages
§ variable deck load and deck space can be limited
§ relatively slow transit speed
§ may require tow vessels to move (modern DP semis are fully self-propelled)
 
Drillship advantages
§ relatively fast transit
§ most drillship designs can accommodate large loads of casing,mud chemicals and other supplies in below deck holds
Drillship disadvantages
§ less stable than a semi-sub,
§ less suited for harsh environments
§ Response of the vessel to a given seastate is calculated using the RAO –
Response Amplitude Operator
§ function of wave height and wave period
§ varies depending on direction of wave (head, beam, quartering)
§ Heave, surge and sway RAO is dimensionless (m/m)

Wave period is key
§ Typical North Sea rough weather, 10-14 second waves
§ drillship heave response is OK compared to semi-sub
§ drillship pitch response worse than semi-sub
§ North Atlantic Storm, 14-19 second waves

Semi-sub pitch and heave response is relatively good, whereas Drillship pitch and heave response is relatively poor.
Very long ocean swells >19 second period can give the semi submersible problems as wave period approaches the heave natural frequency. Such seas can occur in some open ocean areas
§ if heave RAO = 0.3 m/m, then in 10m wave, vessel will heave 3m
§ Pitch, roll and yaw RAO is °/m
§ if pitch RAO = 0.5 °/m, then in 10m wave, vessel will roll 5°
In deep water and harsh environment/high current location, riser tensioning capacity may be critical requirement
§ riser analysis essential to determine string configuration and top tension requirements
§ riser tensioning capacity varies considerably
§ <1 lbs="" million="" to="">5 million lbs
§ A heavy riser string will place considerable demands on the rig when running BOP
§ string weight in excess of 1.5 million lbs may be required in some situations
§ riser design may not permit fully buoyant string
§ additional acceleration loads due to rig heave
§ derrick and travelling equipment must be up to the task
Many deepwater rigs (most 6th generation) both semi and ship have some degree of dual activity capability
§ significant time savings possible in deepwater
§ drill top hole, run surface casing while running BOP
§ in development drilling, can very efficiently install subsea trees
§ pick up and rack drillpipe, casing offline
§ 20-30% time saving possible, depending on operations
§ can offset day rate premium
§ Best suited to short duration exploration and development drilling
§ high percentage of open water work





Standards for subdivision and damage stability have been established by international conventions, by recommendations of IMO, by national regulations and by classification society rules. In this chapter we shall confine ourselves to the standards related to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea “SOLAS” and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships “MARPOL”.

The “SOLAS” Standards :

The basic philosophy of these standards is that the true index of safety is the probability of survival after damage occurring anywhere along the length of the ship, between or on a bulkhead.

Fundamentally, three probabilities relate to subdivision and damage stability requirements:

(a) Probability that a ship/rig may be damaged.

(b) If the ship/rig is damaged, the probability as to the location and extent of damage.

(c) Probability that the ship/rig may survive such flooding.

Chapter II-1 of the SOLAS shall apply to ships the keels of which are laid on or after 1 January 2009. These requirements apply to cargo ships of 80 m in length (L) and upwards and to all passenger ships regardless of length. The degree of subdivision shall vary with the subdivision length (Ls) of the ship and with the service, in such manner that the highest degree of subdivision corresponds with the ships of greatest subdivision length (Ls), primarily engaged in the carriage of passengers.

Definitions

1. Subdivision Length (Ls) : The greatest projected length of that part of the ship at or below deck or decks limiting the vertical extent of flooding with the ship at the deepest subdivision draft.
2. Mid-Length : The mid-point of the subdivision length of the ship.
3. Aft and Forward Terminals : The aft and forward limits of the subdivision length.
4. Length (L) : The length as defined in the International Convention on Load lines.
5. Deepest Subdivision Draft (ds) : The waterline which corresponds to the summer load line draft of the ship.
6. Light Service Draft (dl) : The service draft corresponding to the lightest anticipated loading and associated tankage.
7. Partial Subdivision Draft (dp) : The light service draft plus 60% of the difference between the light service draft and the deepest subdivision draft.
8. Permeability (μ) : The permeability of a space is the proportion of the immersed volume of that space which can be occupied by water.
9. Bulkhead Deck : In a passenger ship means the uppermost deck at any point in the subdivision length (Ls) to which the main bulkheads and the ship’s shell are carried watertight. The bulkhead deck may be a stepped deck. In a cargo ship the freeboard deck may be taken as the bulkhead deck.
10. Amidship : At the middle of the length (L).

Permeability :
For the purpose of the subdivision and damage stability calculations of the regulations, the permeability of each general compartment or part of a compartment shall be as follows:

Spaces  -  "Permeability"

Appropriated to stores 0.60
Occupied by accommodation 0.95
Occupied by machinery 0.85
Void spaces 0.95
Intended for liquids 0 or 0.95

For the purpose of the subdivision and damage stability calculations of the regulations, the permeability of each cargo compartment or part of a compartment shall be as follows:

Spaces -- "Permeability at draft ds" ,  "Permeability at draft dp" ,   "Permeability at draft dl"

Dry cargo spaces  0.70, 0.80, 0.95
Container spaces  0.70, 0.80, 0.95
Ro-ro spaces        0.90, 0.90, 0.95
Cargo liquids       0.70, 0.80, 0.95