Thursday, April 29, 2010

Horizon on Fire

The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig which caught fire few days back, lasted two days, then sank in 5,000 ft of water in the Gulf of Mexico. The rig belongs to Transocean. The rig was originally contracted through the year 2013 to BP and was working on BP’s Macondo exploration well when the fire broke out. The day rate for the rig costs about US$500K per day to contract. The complete drilling day cost, with helicopters and support vessels and other services, will cost closer to US$1 mil per day to operate drilling for oil and gas. The rig building cost about US$350 mil in 2001 and would probably double that if order one today with steel prices, material cost rising. The rig represents the cutting edge of drilling technology. It is a floating rig, capable of working in up to 3000m water depth. The rig is not moored as it would be too costly and too heavy to suspend this mooring load from the floating structure. There should be a cost study done to compare options of moored or DP and long term operational cost viability. This rig has a triple-redundant computer system uses satellite positioning to control powerful thrusters that keep the rig on station at all times. From web information, seems like the rig had apparently just finished cementing steel casing in place at depths exceeding 18,000 ft. The next operation was to suspend the well so that the rig could move to its next drilling location, the idea being that a rig would return to this well later in order to complete the work necessary to bring the well into production. Initial speculation news that was thought that somehow formation fluids –oil /gas –got into the wellbore and were undetected until it was too late to take action. Usually a “kick” would have been detected from the cabin monitoring controls. With a floating drilling semi-submersible, because it moves with the waves, currents and wind, the main pressure control equipment sits on the sub-seabed –the bottom point in the well is only part unmoved. There is a setup of ‘BOP’s” and controlled with redundant systems from the rig being laid just above the seabed. In the event of a serious emergency, this BOP tree will be shut and close against the well preventing back flow of the gas from seabed. Investigation will take some months before all of the reasons are known. The well still is apparently flowing oil, which is appearing at the surface as a slick. They have been working with remotely operated vehicles, or ROV’swhich are essentially tethered miniature submarines with manipulator arms and other equipment that can perform work underwater while the operator sits on a vessel. They have been trying to close the well in using a specialized port on the BOP and a pumping arrangement on their ROV’s. Seems to be unsuccessful so far. Specialized pollution control vessels have been scrambled to start working the spill, skimming the oil up. In the coming weeks there is another plan to move in one other rig ( could be from DD3 built by us ) to drill a fresh well that will intersect the blowing one at its pay zone. They will use technology that is capable of drilling from a floating rig, over 3 miles deep to an exact specific point in the earth –with a target radius of just a few feet plus or minus. Once they intersect their target, a heavy fluid will be pumped that exceeds the formation’s pressure, thus causing the flow to cease and rendering the well safe. Probably will take months to get this done, bringing all available offshore drilling technology to fruition. It will soon be an ecological and environment hazard if the well flows continuously and not stopped.


Subsea systems challenges :

Other challenges facing the rig operator of this kind of deep water drilling vessel relating to deepwater depth in several ways:

•The temperature at the seafloor is such that hydrate formation in any gas migrating to the BOP can freeze the system closed. Provision must be made to flush the connectors routinely with BOP operating fluid (which contains glycol) or as a last resort to inject methanol remotely from the ROV.

•The well pressure at approx 7,500 feet is 230 bar or 3,333 psi. All of the subsea BOP equipment must work in cold, dark, high pressure environment around one and a half miles from the vessel drill floor.

•The long column of drilling fluid in the riser exerts a pressure on the formation. In shallow water this pressure is usually far enough from the fracture pressure of the formation that cuttings can be transported out of the hole without exceeding the fracture pressure and invading the formation. This allows longer sections of hole to be drilled before second casing. As water depth increases the difficulty of keeping mud weights between fracture gradient and pore pressure causes an effective well design to include multiple casing strings driving up both the complexity and the cost of the well

•The marine riser itself must be strong enough to support choke and kill lines, boost lines, hydraulic lines, dual gradient lines and MUX cables and yet light enough to allow a combination of top tension and buoyancy to support it for a defined range of mud weights and vessel offsets.

•The time to run any piece of equipment to the seafloor is a significant part of the total operational time. It can take days to round trip the BOP in 7,500 feet of water and the rig is vulnerable to environmental extremes while the BOP is suspended below the rig

Below typical schematic of the subsea BOP control system which should be able to shut the well once activated. With so many cables and tubings going down the seabed, probably anything can go wrong during the Horizon emergency and Murphy's law set in, anything wrong goes.

Well Control

As a result, the design of the riser, its buoyancy, the BOP and sub-sea system is the most critical element of the overall design of the rig. The size and weight of a 21” riser and 18 ¾” 15K BOP system that dictates the overall size and therefore cost of the rig. Most deepwater operators are well aware of this and extensive research has been undertaken by them to find ways to allow smaller and less capable rigs to drill safely and effectively in the ultra deep water. These technologies include :-

•Dual density drilling – to solve the pressure differential problem referred to above.
•Slimbore wells to allow the use of 16” riser and a 13 5/8” BOP
•Expandable tubing to facilitate slim bore wells
•Free standing riser systems
•Artificially buoyant seabeds bringing the wellhead closer to the surface

All of these technologies hold future promise but they also represent compromises in the primary objective which is to deliver a quality high production well to the operator.



Horizon


With the Horizon rig going “under”, oil began gushing to the surface at an ever-increasing rate. In the worst case scenario, the daily outflow of oil is projected to reach as many as 60,000 barrels (2.5 million gallons) per day.

Some methods have been used for cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana coastline mess, both through working beneath the waves at 5,000 feet and atop, as the oil surfaced :-

Blowout preventer (Drilling term : BOP ) — In offshore oil industry, it’s an accepted fact that oil drilling rigs and platforms must be protect and prevent well kicks from the well beneath. Despite all safety precautions, there’s always the possibility of an accident that could potentially destroy the entire rig, just as happened with the Deepwater Horizon. But when that does happen, a separate device is supposed to prevent an oil leak at the bottom: the blowout preventer ( Maker like Cameron, Schaffer, Hydril are some of famous ones). For deepwater, subsea BOP is used and for shallow water like drilling jackup, surface BOP is used.

It was a bad luck that the BOP failed to activate. Other semi-submersible have been deployed to try to fix the device with help of ROVs ( remote operated vehicle ) or install a new BOP to stop the flow of oil at its lowest point, but have failed so far. It is not simple task to do it at deepsea where controls underwater are not easy with the temperature and current beneath.

Containment domes – These devices, also called coffer dams, are the second of the three major methods BP hopes will eventually stop or contain the leak by transferring the oil into FPSO. Starting with one this week, BP will lower three 40-foot tall containment “domes” over the leaking sections of pipe on the seabed. Some oil will still escape, but the plan is to suck most of it up through the dome (which is actually more of a rectangle). This idea also reveals the essential crudity of our deep-ocean technology: there’s nothing subtle about dropping just under a hundred tons of concrete onto a leaking pipe.

However, the effort to place a massive containment dome over a gushing underwater wellhead in the Gulf of Mexico was dealt a setback when a large volume of hydrates -- icelike crystals formed when gas combines with water -- accumulated inside the vessel, The dome was moved off to the side of the wellhead and is resting on the seabed while crews work to overcome the challenge



Relief wells — Even if the above two methods are successful, BP will still work on a relief well over the coming months that, when finally completed, will divert oil away from the spill site. Drilling the relief wells is a more involved process than the original well, because the drill bit must work at an angle once it penetrates the seabed. The company estimate its relief well will likely cost in the region of US$100 million.

Oil skimmers — Since some oil sits on top of the water, a clever skimming system can separate the oil to be siphoned away (and potentially even sold on the market like normal oil). Skimming devices can range from small to massive, but despite advances in the technology, none are large enough to deal with a Gulf-sized spill, at least without months of work.

Fire — One of the oldest technologies at least for gasoline, will burn off quickly and even explode. But the “sweet crude” welling up is actually a thick, heavy substance that doesn’t always burn easily or evenly. The Coast Guard attempted to burn enough oil to prevent it from reaching the Louisiana coastline, but failed.


Name: Deepwater Horizon

Reading & Bates Falcon RBS-8D
Owner: Transocean
Port of registry: Majuro
Marshall Islands
Route: Gulf of Mexico

Ordered: December 1998
Builder: Hyundai Heavy Industries

Cost: US$560 million [1][2]
Completed: 2001

Acquired: February 23, 2001

Maiden voyage: Ulsan, South Korea – Freeport, Texas
Out of service: April 21, 2010 (exploded)
Identification: ABS class no.: 0139290

Call sign: V7HC9
IMO number 8764597
General characteristics
Class and type: ABS +A1 DPS-3 Column Stabilized MODU
Tonnage: 32,588 t (32,073 LT; 35,922 ST)
Displacement: 52,587 t (51,756 LT; 57,967 ST)

Length: 112 m (367 ft)
Beam: 78 m (256 ft)
Height: 97.4 m (320 ft)
Draught: 23 m (75 ft)
Depth: 41.5 m (136 ft)

Installed power: 42 MW
Main Power 6 x Wartsila 18V32 rated 9775 hp each, driving 6 x ABB AMG 0900xU10 7000 kW 11,000 volts AC generators

Emergency Power 1 x Caterpillar 3408 DITA driving 1 x Caterpillar SR4 370 kW 480 volts AC generator
Power Distribution 8 x ABB Sami-Megastar Thruster Drives, 5.5 MW and 6 x GE Drilling Drive Lineups 600 V 12 MW
Deck Cranes 2 x Liebherr, 150 ft boom, 80 mt @ 35 ft
Thrusters 8 x Kamewa rated 7375 hp each, fixed propeller, full 360 deg azimuth
Speed: 4 kts
Crew: 146
Notes: 8202 tonne Variable Deck Load, DP Class 3, 8 thrusters, 10,000 ft drilling water depth

Video with courtesy of BP

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Is job hopping good or bad ??

Refer today’s Sunday times interview two extremes working personnel, one stayed with one company for 38years and another seven jobs in 5 years.

Same company for 38 years - Mr Daniel Goh can still recall what he and his peers were looking for in a job, when he applied for his first job with Garuda Airlines in 1972 at the age of 21.  'During our time, it was all about getting a job first, then you look at the salary base, and third was the industry that you wanted to work in,' says Mr Goh, who is married with two children.

He adds: 'In those days, if we managed to get a job at the age of 21, it was something very grand, especially if you were working for an airline.' After 15 years as an airport officer and 23 in the sales department, he has no regrets about staying with his first and only employer.

He says: 'Garuda is like a family - we know the culture and the way they do things, and most importantly, we work as a team. There is no reason for me to ever think of leaving the company.'

Seven jobs in five years - For Ms Jamie Kong, the last five years have been 'a very long learning process' in feeding her 'hunger for learning and self-satisfaction'. From two spells as a Japanese-English translator to two working stints in Japan, and trying her hand at setting up a small F&B stall, she has held a total of seven jobs in her 51/2 years in the workforce.

'It has all been about self-discovery and giving myself what I needed at that stage of life,' says Ms Kong, who now works in the planning department of a Japanese F&B company.  After six months in her first job as a translator, she took up a six-month job with the Singapore Tourism Board at the World Expo in Japan in 2005. Upon her return, she resumed her former job as a translator at her old workplace where she was 'very well taken care of'. However, after two years, she felt she had 'stagnated'.

She says: 'We have been told from young to get a good job with stable pay, which was what I got there, but I felt it was not challenging enough in the long term.'  So she went back to Japan on a year-long exchange programme to teach English.  She recalls: 'It was just for the experience and living and working in Japan, which I had always wanted to do, to experience life and get paid as well. I had always planned to stay for just a year.'

After that, she came back to Singapore to work for a Japanese F&B company. She left after seven months, as it was 'not a healthy work environment'.  She feels she has found the right environment in her current job. She has also found a passion for the industry, which combines her love of food with her interest in Japanese culture.  While she cannot imagine herself in the same job for 20 years, she can certainly conceive of staying with a company for 20 years.

She says: 'You need a job that you can identify with. As long as you are given room to grow and progress, you can stay in a place for the long term. But if you do not grow in life experiences, you do not grow.'


Me, I started 1980 after completed 2 years full time national service as an infantry man, landed first job 7 seven years in Natco ( American Oil and Gas Process company, now no more existence in Singapore but in US, UK, http://www.natcogroup.com/). Second job of 7 years landed in a Japanese owned company (http://www.otec.com.sg/) and these Japanese bosses ( Mr Konishi, retired, Mr Hiraoka took over the helm now ) have been PR in Singapore for more than 20 years and already blended their culture with locals. Typical Japanese working lifestyle that you see in Japan, long hours carried on with a lot of smoke ( not really, these bunch are the health conscious lot ). Golf is the other part of their life.
Most likely my last work place before retirement, presently with KeppelFELS (http://www.keppelfels.com.sg/), Offshore rig designer and builder ( key solution provider ) joined 1994 and I would say it is a great place with the greatest achievement in my working career, a lot had to be said later. Probably start a memoir, if anyone care to read, not really perhaps..... :)


People in their 20s probably tend to change job quite often than those when reaching mid 30s, late 40s. So if you think job-hopping is good or bad?? . Job hoppers are deemed quitters and generally they feel more satisfied with their work life after hopping from one to another work place but not all feel the same.

Would Job hoppers have more rewarding careers.

In almost any job, the learning curve is very steep early on. And then it goes flat. So by the end of two years at the same job, you often have little left to learn if you work in administrative kind instead of those relating to technology or engineering where there are a lot of hands-on application and thinking process. It just make one wonder what people are doing to keep their brains alive if they stay at the same job for 20 years especially those mundane kind that do not need to squeeze out your brain juice. It could leave some uncertainty that job hoppers may know more.

If you change jobs often, then you’re facing with different kind environment and are you sure you get to learn — your learning curve has to move with new job description, i.e. if you are given to experience new things. This may not be true for office skills unless those engineering specific knowledge. It also applies to your emotional intelligence. The more you have to navigate organization hierarchies and deal with office dramas, the more you learn about people and the better you will become at making people comfortable while you encounter with them. And that’s a great skill to have but you may or may not get your learning interrupted if you start hopping to new place as you could end up repeating similar task or worst still the new company is not advancing faster than your previous place.

The stability you get in your career comes from yourself. If you’re counting on some company to give you stability, realizing this could be at times ending up not to your expectation. But if you believe in yourself and your abilities and treat your career with this understanding, then it’s no problem. You can create career stability — you just have to do it on your own capability. Do no “apple-polishing” as this will not bring you any further in your career.

If one day you are planning greener pastures, you’re going to be very conscious of your resume — that is, what skills you’re tackling, what you’re achieving, whether you’re becoming a so-call “expert” in your field. These issues do not generally concern someone who has been in a job for five years or more and knows he’s going to stay another five years or so. So job hoppers have to strive harder and do doubly well at work, if for no other reason than it helps their impressive resume secure their next lucrative job.

Job hoppers could end up overachievers on work activity they are involved in; they want something good to put on their resume. Though some companies could benefit from having a strong performer for 2 years than a mediocre employee for 20 years who has stayed stagnant.

Loyalty is caring about the people you’re with. Job hoppers don’t identify with a company’s long-term performance, they identify with their work group’s short-term performance. Job hoppers want their boss to adore them so they get a good reference. Job hoppers want to bond with their co-workers so they can all help each other get jobs later on. And job hoppers want to make sure everyone who comes into contact with them has experience to bring along with them; it’s not like they have ten years on the job to fix a first impression.

It takes a good deal of self-knowledge to know what you want to do next, and to choose to go get it rather than stay someplace that for the moment seems secured. It takes commitment to personal growth to give up career complacency and embrace a challenging learning curve throughout your career — over and over. And it’s a brave person who can tell someone, “I know I’ve only been working here for few months, but I think it does not suits me”

Doubtless you’ll hear that you should stick it out, show some loyalty, give it at least a few years. But why should you take time out of your life to spend your days doing something you know is not right for you? When is the right time to move on ? Is there a good opportunity and are you going to fit in ? What consequence if you leave your present company ? What opportunity cost you are losing out ?

No career is interesting if it’s not engaging and challenging, and your most important job is to find that right organization. Do not settle for outdated workplace models that accept complacency and downplay self-knowledge. Sure, the job market is tough nowadays - but that’s no reason to settle for something mediocre and no challenge at all. Without challenges, you just stayed on with no progress and this is not the path on the last day of your retirement when you turn back and say, “what did I do or learn in life?”

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

We need brainstorming ideas in workplace

Brainstorming purpose is to let creativity grow in the workplace and office managers should encourage such activity as often as possible amongst the working level.. However, we must not to let criticism kill the creativity spirit. The creative process must be supported, nurtured and embraced by the seniors in the office to enable possible good working results to be surfaced. There are some guidelines to making sure the process of brainstorming within the group and that the team agrees to them before any idea generation begins.

As ideas begin to flow, we must do everything in our ability to let these ideas flow. No one should start to pre-judge the ideas thrown on the table. The idea-generation is about coming out with as many ideas, not ranking them and then later put in time to evaluate them. Even if the person next to you throws out the stupidest idea which you think could be, let the process continue. Any comment or criticism will change the mood in the group, and they will start to clam up. The objective is to bring ideas to the surface, not to discuss them.

Once an idea hits the whiteboard, we will start to wonder how the idea would come to life, what would it cost? Who to take lead to start the ball rolling? What would the end result of the idea going to look like? What would the financial implications be? Where would the work idea take place? As important as that kind of thinking may be, it will crush the creativity idea very quickly and we need to thread our footpath very carefully.

Thus, fear is the biggest killer of creativity. We learn in schooldays that there is always one right answer and we should avoid making errors at all cost and with chinese culture, it inbuild in us that mistake made will make us “lose our face”. We need to release that fear to unlock our true creative potential. If we're leading the group, emphasize this before we begin. Tell our staff that every idea matters and that the whole point is to get a lot of ideas on the table. To best create an environment where everyone feels comfortable taking risks and has no fear of embarrassment or negative consequences, we need to set an example. If we as leader aren't afraid to toss out silly, outrageous ideas, we will likely to encourage others to release their fears as well, so that their most creative thinking can emerge. We can always learn a lot from the past, but it can also limit our ability to invent the future. Holding back an idea because we tried it once before and it didn't work out so well is limiting factor.. Imagine the world we live in changes none stop every day. An idea today comes into a world with an entirely new set of situations, market environment, technologies and customer preferences. If it happened not to work in the past, it may just have been ahead of its time. Or perhaps that idea, when revisited, will lead to a revised version that can carry the day. Every idea could be a new one at this moment, so share every single one that we believe has got it’s credit and substance.

Brainstorming sessions can easily dissolve into wandering and woolgathering. We need to watch out and not let it happen. An idea might remind someone of a past incident or it might lead to taking on a different creative challenge, or discussing a completely different topic. A right-brain creative state is so rare and so refreshing that its energy and excitement can cause a team to stray. To solve this, keep some of those not so relevant ones on a “parking lot” list to be discussed another time. This will keep the group focused on the task at hand while still making sure that important concepts are remembered and can get attention later.

Just as we manage the storming situation, the collective energy of the room can build into a frenzy, unleashing brilliant ideas while everyone has a great time, or it can devolve into yet another boring clock-watching drone session. We need to keep the energy up and maybe with some intermittent High-fives, cheers and positive vibes in between session. Let’s not allow negativity and energy-draining commentary bore the life from the room. Comparing ideas is an insidious form of criticism that needs to be checked at the door with all other left-brain habits. Comparing usually contains an implicit criticism. Brainstorming can become quite jolly, and the temptation to start joking about what comes up can be hard to resist and laughter at the expense of an idea is a fast way to kill it.

Brainstorming is a profoundly useful creative technique to generate solutions, new thoughts, improve work methodology, save cost, increase productivity, but only if we all know how to use it properly and be disciplined in the process of carrying it out in groups.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Leading your staff more than just with your brain

The truth is that building strong and good work relationship amongst our office staff and within the organization can be tough and challenging for office leaders. Most of us naturally are inclined to lead with our heads, believing we are experience and intelligent, through organized planning, extensive review and as usual a steady temperament. That approach has generally suited everyone but not a perfect approach.

By leading with our heads is also the same trait that tempts us to head to the running trails for a solo workout instead of walking around to chat with office staff. Often we leave a room as soon as a meeting is over to get to the next assignment, instead of sticking around for a few extra minutes to connect with colleagues on a more personal level. Normally we do not do more “personnel contact”. In certain cases, that could be a good thing for a leader; it's important to maintain independence and a little distance. But, like any leadership strength, self-reliance and playing things close to the vest can be overdone.

In hard times, as some of us are facing now, leading with our heads is not enough. Our staff need more than sheer business expertise, whether it be a smart strategy, the right organizational structure, or clever technical solutions. It is also hard for leaders to build trust with their people—and without that trust it's hard to accomplish much. In many organizations, most of the colleagues are working more hours for less pay and benefits.

Then there are some practical steps to leading more than just with your head. The more we practice them, the better you'll become at connecting with your staff and colleagues.

• Listen to individual

Now more than ever, we need to be a CLO, Chief Listening Officer in your organization. Make sure you devote several meetings each week simply to listening to colleagues, customers and your peers. When you're in these meetings, maintain eye contact, lean forward, nod. Show you're engaged.

Just as significantly, pay attention to what the other person is expressing, not only with their words but also through their tone of voice, facial expressions, and posture. Can you accurately summarize the thoughts and feelings being shared with you? If not clear, suggest ask for clarifications. Do not practice “mind reading” as we know there is no such skill and able to accurately read others mind of what they are thinking. Also do not ever try to be a psychologist and guess what others have in their mind.

• Be known in the office

It's often the practice to eat a quick lunch at your desk so that there is a chance to make phone calls, check through reports and read or clear some e-mails. Make a point once a week of sitting down at a table and joining your staff and get engage in conversation over lunch.

• Show gratitude

A word of “thank you” to an overworked, underappreciated employee can make a huge difference. It's even more important when a bad economy last year restrain or prevent the company to reward staff financially. Be specific, and they'll know you understand something about their role—and that makes your praise all the more and meaningful.
• Invest in staff development

Ensure that your teams are engaged in meaningful work and that you have good development plans for the staff members. If things are slow for one team, turn its members loose on key projects that are important for the future of the organization and that will help build their skills. Nothing is more important than showing interest in the professional development of your staff —so the company should try to invest more often in the training of staff they need.

I do not believe there is a guarantee that following this advice will suddenly help you lead as authentically. But at the very least, we can all get considerably better at connecting with our office colleagues through focus and practice. We need to make leading of our staff with our hearts as one of the many staff management priorities. When we don't, we jeopardize all the magnificent plans in our mind and worst of all, the company or organization will not be progressing fast and better than it’s competitors over the present competitive global arena.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Let others steal your credit and ideas......it is OK

When you are in a big organization, you probably will never create a solid career for yourself by worrying about who is using your solutions and ideas. There probably is some nepotism, if the staff around you are related to the management or some kind of related relationship with the senior people. People hate whiners, they hate bickering, and, most importantly, people who are confident that they have many plans and ideas don’t keep track of each one. And, let’s face it, we do not get far by just having ideas. You need to be likable in the eyes of the management and which means you are either in sync with them or singing the same tune all the time with the CEO ( probably the CEO likes that ! ). So cut it out. Worrying about who gets credit for which solutions or ideas will prevent you from having a fulfilling career in your hectic work life, especially in some kind of tough industries with challenging schedules to meet. Why ??

There is no such thing as infinite count of good ideas -

Good people - the ones who have tons of good ideas - share them. If you’re a business venturer, you have an idea and call some friends to share it. They may say why your idea won’t work, and you do the same thing the next week, until you land on an idea that does work. However for an entrepreneur, the ideas never stop coming and you never stop sharing them.

Those who have lots of ideas or at times “think out of the box” don’t bother to treasure their ideas and keep it secret. If your ideas are so valuable that they need protecting - or you think they do - you’ll come across as someone who is anything but creative. Then no one will hire you for your ideas. So if you want to be known for your ideas, act like someone who has a lot of them. Keep them coming and give them away all the time. It will benefit you more than keeping them tight in your pocket.

Bosses like “nice” people and dislike “smart alec” -

It may be true that most would rather work with people who are likeable than those who are competent but selfish. In fact, some view the nice people as more competent, even if they are not. And the skilled people who are jerks start appearing incompetent to their co-workers. That’s how powerful being nice at the office is. In other words, others will view you as you better at your job if you stop bitching about who gets credit for ideas or solutions.

As I see, management would likely prefer those who help others get their job done. That person genuinely cares if you are happy doing your work; they genuinely cares if it feel connected and engaged. One way to become that well-liked person - share your workable ideas and sell it for FREE.

Try make your boss look up to you -

Do not complain and do not be the “YES” man either. Demanding that your boss give you all the credit does not help, either. If you make your boss’s life easy, he may help you. Hopefully he or she will mentor you, train you, guide you through the organization and recommend pay adjustment for you. Bosses do not complain that they don’t have enough idea people working for them. Bosses complain that there is too much work to do. This is because bosses always think they are the idea people, whether or not they are. So if your boss thinks your staff has all the ideas, it doesn’t matter. Your boss will recognize those who gets things done.

If you want to get credit for your ideas, you could try a blog -

Resumes may not showcase ideas. Resumes are a history of what others have allowed you to do in their organization. If you want to be known for the ideas you are coming up with right now, then try to put in your blog. It’s incredibly easy to write a blog if you have a lot of ideas. The ideas need not reveal company proprietary info; they just need to reveal how you think - about a wide range of things in your specialised field. Try putting your ideas out for public reference. Don’t write about people stealing your ideas. Your blog ideas, should they be convincing, then others will associate those ideas with you.

Be “Open Source” software -

Imagine yourself as “Open Source” software versus “proprietary” software. Open Source’s strength is that many people contribute to the growth and refinement of it. It’s a breeding ground for people to share ideas. Credit is shared, and tracked as the software evolves. And as your contribution to it grows you will gain power and recognition in the community.

Alternative to blogging your ideas, Speak up -

Make sure the Boss hears your ideas at meetings, in emails, in memos — establish yourself as a constant “source” of bright thinking and good ideas within your team. Do not try to outshine your peers in front too much and control yourself. Otherwise, you may be seemed to be too arrogant in the meeting.

Work Hard -

Be seen as the person on the team that always does your homework. Never come to a meeting unprepared. Think through what the agenda is, and add your insights and ideas, in front of everyone. Refrain from talking irrelevant issues not related to the topic of discussion.

Push yourself to the front -

That doesn’t mean you have to be “in-their-face”, but it does mean that you should seek out opportunities where you can show your abilities to best advantage. (eg. trade shows, trade publications, special committees) In the long term, wise companies will ensure that all employees who participate in the creation of new ideas are recognized. New ideas are one of the engines of economic growth after all.

Where will all this get you? Hopefully some organization or headhunter will want to hire you or work with you not because of the list of tasks on your resume, but because you are that person with all those sound ideas. And once you’re hired, it doesn’t matter if someone has stolen your ideas and your credit.